Teams

DGonzalez (Queens)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-03vs ZWester (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRafael Balderrama / Gerardo Estrada vs Jeremy Rhoten / Jason Colgate2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-09-26vs TJones (Jeff Adams) (CCT)Won 10
W#3 DoublesIvan Blakeney / Leonard Evansek vs Ornob Roy / Mac Schweppe6-4, 6-2
2022-09-19vs MTwer (Weddington)Won 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Gonzalez / Ganesh Pallem vs Vladislav Valtsis / Brian D Vessels6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIvan Blakeney / Leonard Evansek vs Scott Terada / Ken Klug6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRafael Balderrama / Tobi Abel vs Andrew Lawler / Eric O'Brien6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-12vs STyagi (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRoberto de Jesus / Ganesh Pallem vs Saurabh Tyagi / Jonathan Diaz6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2022-08-29vs ZWester (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRoberto de Jesus / Ganesh Pallem vs Kunal Verma / Jason Colgate6-0, 6-4
2022-08-22vs TJones (Jeff Adams) (CCT)Won 10
W#3 DoublesGanesh Pallem / Leonard Evansek vs Zak Gilbert / Todd Mason4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-15vs MTwer (Weddington)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRafael Balderrama / Ganesh Pallem vs Andrew Lawler / Vladislav Valtsis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeonard Evansek / Daniel Gonzalez vs Bruce Gibson / Scott Terada6-0, 6-0
2022-08-08vs STyagi (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRoberto de Jesus / Ganesh Pallem vs Kshitiz Gupta / Jonathan Diaz3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Ganesh Pallem
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Ivan Blakeney
published 3.5
3.40
Rafael Balderrama
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Leonard Evansek
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Drew Turney
published 3.5
3.06
Gerardo Estrada
published 3.5
Tobi Abel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rafael Balderrama + Gerardo Estrada5360% games+7.3% vs expected
Rafael Balderrama + Leonard Evansek9264% gamesnot enough data
Drew Turney + Leonard Evansek303 matchesnot enough data
Leonard Evansek + Gerardo Estrada123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ganesh Pallem
129W–71L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Ivan Blakeney
26W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Rafael Balderrama
138W–132L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Leonard Evansek
186W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Drew Turney
15W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gerardo Estrada
25W–38L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Tobi Abel
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.