Teams

Marble/Hosamane - Bandits

2024 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 6.0 MX (SUN)

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-10vs Fredrickson ES24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Hosamane / Mike Wohnoutka vs Alisa Chase / Tom Larson6-7, 6-7
2023-11-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hosamane / Vinay Hosamane vs Keith Jacobson / Diane Miller6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-11-05vs AltendahlLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Hosamane / David Power vs Cindy Altendahl / Jim Altendahl2-6, 3-6
2023-10-29vs Trettel: Over ServedLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Power / Catherine Hosamane vs Jeff Johnson / Alice Douthwaite2-6, 2-6
2023-10-22vs Jackson-Good VibrationsWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Power / Catherine Hosamane vs Paul Bartone / Danielle Grimaldi7-5, 6-4
2023-10-08vs Stordahl Kelly's HeroesLost 01
L#1 DoublesRodolfo Dy / Catherine Hosamane vs Gretchen Schroeder / Gene Lee0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Catherine Hosamane
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Joanna Hider
published
2.99
Amy Haynes
published 3
2.77
2.71
Rodolfo Dy
published
2.62
Maria Cecilia Ray
published
2.26
Dan Ray
published 2.5
Jerome MacAriola
published
Mike Wohnoutka
published
Sandra Marble
published
Vinay Hosamane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Hosamane + Dan Ray224 matchesnot enough data
Maria Annette MacAriola + Jerome MacAriola213 matchesnot enough data
Maria Cecilia Ray + Dan Ray033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Hosamane
163W–105L career · 9 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Joanna Hider
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Amy Haynes
28W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
Maria Annette MacAriola
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Rodolfo Dy
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Maria Cecilia Ray
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
2.5
Dan Ray
6W–7L career · type M · no lines in 2024
0%96%4%
2.26
Jerome MacAriola
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Wohnoutka
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Marble
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vinay Hosamane
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.