Teams

Geethadevi

2025 NOGTA Southern Combo 40 & Over - Summer · Women 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-09vs NOGTA/Sharel HooperLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenni Johnson / Jewel Akpose vs Carol Tigar / Caroline Bentley6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRekha Geethadevi / Suzanne Hanley vs Lisa Govan / Lorraine Marks1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Morgan / Lucynda Cynda Holmes vs Kimberly Conner / Lori Cook6-3, 6-2
2025-08-19vs NOGTA/Sharel HooperLost 02
L#1 DoublesJenni Johnson / Heather Tuttle vs Carol Tigar / Lorraine Marks4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRekha Geethadevi / Suzanne Hanley vs Sharel Hooper / Lisa Govan3-6, 5-7
2025-07-29vs NOGTA/Sharel HooperWon 30
W#1 DoublesRekha Geethadevi / Elizabeth Morgan vs Lisa Govan / Kimberly Conner6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNicole Brown / Heather Tuttle vs Susan Crum / Marialice Hatch7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Hanley / Jewel Akpose vs Sharel Hooper / Carol Tigar2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angie Paulson
published 4
3.40
Rekha Geethadevi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Jenni Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Suzanne Hanley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Tara McFarlane
published
3.24
Heather Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Jewel Akpose
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Morgan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenni Johnson + Rekha Geethadevi5453% games+7.1% vs expected
Jewel Akpose + Tara McFarlane5349% games+4.1% vs expected
Angie Paulson + Heather Tuttle044 matchesnot enough data
Rekha Geethadevi + Heather Tuttle224 matchesnot enough data
Jenni Johnson + Heather Tuttle123 matchesnot enough data
Rekha Geethadevi + Jewel Akpose123 matchesnot enough data
Rekha Geethadevi + Tara McFarlane033 matchesnot enough data
Tara McFarlane + Heather Tuttle033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Paulson
0W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rekha Geethadevi
17W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
Jenni Johnson
20W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
Suzanne Hanley
29W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.29
Tara McFarlane
47W–66L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Heather Tuttle
35W–62L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
Jewel Akpose
53W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.22
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
23W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Elizabeth Morgan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.