Teams

Hoogestraat/Ivers

2026 USTA League Tennis Adult Summer-RC 18 · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-18vs Snider/LucasSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTori Sheets / Kate Salkowski vs Heidi Snider / Lisa Katzenstein3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJeanne Wing / Cynthia Robertson vs Anne-Marie Rolando / Gerty Wyatt2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesCeleste Ramos vs Yakeline Cruz Santiago6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeresa Postma / NIcole Hoogestraat vs Shawna Evans / Clarissa Stinson6-1, 7-6
2026-06-11vs Snider/LucasWon 21
W#2 DoublesKate Salkowski / Tori Sheets vs Shawna Evans / Clarissa Stinson6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesCeleste Ramos vs Kimberly Lucas3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeanne Wing / Teresa Postma vs Yakeline Cruz Santiago / Erin Rup6-4, 6-2
2026-06-04vs Snider/LucasWon 21
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellison / Kate Salkowski vs Anne-Marie Rolando / Heidi Snider6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTori Sheets vs Kelsey Rausch1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrie Groves / NIcole Hoogestraat vs Lisa Katzenstein / Kimberly Lucas6-4, 6-1
2026-05-28vs Snider/LucasWon 32
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellison / Kate Salkowski vs Kimberly Lucas / Heidi Snider6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTori Sheets vs Kelsey Rausch3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrie Groves / Cynthia Robertson vs Anne-Marie Rolando / Gerty Wyatt0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMiranda Carlson vs Yakeline Cruz Santiago6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTeresa Postma / NIcole Hoogestraat vs Shawna Evans / Erin Rup6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hoogestraat/Ivers3111919168
2Snider/Lucas1391125176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kate Salkowski
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.40
Tori Sheets
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.35
Abbey Ellison
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
NIcole Hoogestraat
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Celeste Ramos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Brie Groves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Teresa Postma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Jeanne Wing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Cynthia Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Miranda Carlson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celeste Ramos + Tori Sheets3249% games−0.3% vs expected
Kate Salkowski + Abbey Ellison404 matchesnot enough data
Kate Salkowski + Tori Sheets123 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Robertson + Brie Groves033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Salkowski
9W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Tori Sheets
13W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Abbey Ellison
9W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
NIcole Hoogestraat
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Celeste Ramos
6W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Brie Groves
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Postma
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Jeanne Wing
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cynthia Robertson
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.96
Miranda Carlson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.