Teams

Parkland - Les

2021 Broward Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-08-16vs Piccolo - HaimLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnthony Cottone / Brian Stephanak vs ARA TOROYAN / Anthony Phillips1-6, 1-5
L#2 DoublesAtif Raoof / David Williams vs Haim Sasson / Adam Ford3-6, 2-1
2021-07-22vs Sunrise - SanchezWon 10
W#1 DoublesAtif Raoof / Diego Velasquez vs Eduardo Alvarez / Alejandro Arraiz7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-15vs Broward - Ltc/SauermanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesT Dienes / David Williams vs Michael Nouri / Timothy House6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Tim Carey vs Patricio Casali / Oscar Arcos3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Tim Carey
published
4.40
T Dienes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Alejandro Cadena
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Evan David
published 4.5
4.21
Anthony Cottone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Atif Raoof
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
David Williams
published 4.5
3.81
Giovanni Guido
published 4
Cody Wall
published 4
3.68
Diego Velasquez
published 4
Les Liese
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

T Dienes + Alejandro Cadena19659% games−3.3% vs expected
Anthony Cottone + T Dienes8261% gamesnot enough data
Anthony Cottone + Atif Raoof224 matchesnot enough data
Atif Raoof + Alejandro Cadena314 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Cottone + Alejandro Cadena123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Carey
6W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
T Dienes
88W–30L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Alejandro Cadena
110W–54L career · 1 line in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Evan David
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Anthony Cottone
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Atif Raoof
106W–101L career · 2 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
David Williams
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Giovanni Guido
12W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Cody Wall
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Diego Velasquez
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Les Liese
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.