Teams

Wells

2025 NOGTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Women 6.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-07vs ThorntonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMolly Carlson / Faith Kinnamon vs Jenna Thomas / Pam Mills1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Cochran-Wells / Julie Stokes vs Crissy Davis / Samantha Watson6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-30vs NOGTA/Connie CorbinLost 02
L#1 DoublesFaith Kinnamon / Julie Stokes vs Pushpa Bhatter / Wendy Norfleet1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Joyce / Suzi Thorne vs April Chambers / Connie Corbin0-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs NOGTA/Chelsey OglesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMolly Carlson / Jane Stahl vs Abbigail Henry / Tiffany Laird3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSuzi Thorne / Faith Kinnamon vs Kari Martin / Terri Brunvoll0-6, 1-6
2025-06-13vs NOGTA/Connie CorbinLost 03
L#1 DoublesKortney McKenzie / Jane Stahl vs Lisa Garrett / Lauren Sain3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Carlson / Suzi Thorne vs Judy Coomer / Connie Corbin1-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cochran-Wells / Julie Stokes vs Jessica Carter / Kay Henderson2-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs ThorntonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKortney McKenzie / Hannah Joyce vs Jenna Thomas / Candace Mason0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSuzi Thorne / Molly Carlson vs Crissy Davis / Urooj Wali0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cochran-Wells / Julie Stokes vs MacI Mills / Pam Mills6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NOGTA/Parmesh Venkatesu411237102
2Wells1431224172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hannah Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.44
Suzi Thorne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Faith Kinnamon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Julie Stokes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jane Stahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kortney McKenzie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Cochran-Wells
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzi Thorne + Julie Stokes01218% games−16.3% vs expected
Michelle Cochran-Wells + Julie Stokes1437% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Hannah Joyce
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzi Thorne
2W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Faith Kinnamon
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Stokes
1W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.23
Jane Stahl
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kortney McKenzie
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Cochran-Wells
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.