Teams

SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesMirella Bucci / Jennifer Chon vs Hannah Kim / Riyalyne Kim Zabat6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAshley Chang vs Jess Sterrett3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Fanucchi / Jenna Lowenstein vs Kristen Pierce / Natalie Wong6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesSeema Moorjani vs Elaine Yang6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFang Cai / Pamela Fuerst vs Meyla Ruwin / Tiffany Truong0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKathy Buckley / Seema Moorjani vs Kristen Pierce / Katherine Alevizos3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Fanucchi / Jenna Lowenstein vs Su-Mien Chong / Tiffany Truong6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLaureen Cortez / Lynette Lissin vs Jing Gu / Meyla Ruwin0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Ashley Chang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.53
Laura Fanucchi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Jenna Lowenstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Jennifer Chon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Laureen Cortez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Mirella Bucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Janet Stebbins
published
3.09
Kathy Buckley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Allison Elliott
published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Fuerst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Seema Moorjani
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Melynnie Rizvi
published
3.02
Gloria Chaw
published 3
2.95
Cecile Holweg
published 3
2.92
Lynette Lissin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Elaine Chen
published 3
2.68
Fang Cai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.66
Noriko Sekikawa
published
2.56
Tiffany Dheedene
published
Silke Roedder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette Lissin + Cecile Holweg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Chang
18W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Laura Fanucchi
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Jenna Lowenstein
20W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.48
Jennifer Chon
26W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Laureen Cortez
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Mirella Bucci
16W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Janet Stebbins
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Kathy Buckley
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Allison Elliott
0W–12L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.07
Pamela Fuerst
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
Seema Moorjani
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Melynnie Rizvi
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Gloria Chaw
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Cecile Holweg
3W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lynette Lissin
6W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Elaine Chen
12W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3.5
Fang Cai
2W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.68
Noriko Sekikawa
5W–22L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
Tiffany Dheedene
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.56
Silke Roedder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.