Teams

Selico/40/DII/TM/TTCC

2026 NO Tri Level 40 & Over - Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0 NO (40&O) Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-05vs Costello/40/DII/TM/MCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChad Bloodworth / John Lindsey vs David Myers / Marc Jaynes3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJuan Melguizo / Ian Smith vs Kip Patron / Dennis Robichaux6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-21vs Bonnet-Generes/40/DII/TM/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Oser / Jun Bausa vs Shakeeb Shariff / Carl Monvoisin1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeo Selico / Juan Melguizo vs Christian Generes / Michael Madere1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChad Bloodworth / John Lindsey vs Mark Broussard / Javier Jacome6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-16vs Costello/40/DII/TM/MCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Lindsey / Juan Melguizo vs Marc Jaynes / Brian Rotolo3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCurry Royal / Guillermo Paredes vs David Myers / Dennis Robichaux2-6, 3-6
2026-06-18vs Bonnet-Generes/40/DII/TM/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesJuan Melguizo / Jamie Brown vs Michael Kennedy / Thomas Wolf3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIan Smith / Curry Royal vs Christian Generes / Jourdan Generes2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGuillermo Paredes / Jun Bausa vs Bert Miller / Carl Monvoisin4-6, 4-6
2026-06-11vs Costello/40/DII/TM/MCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Lindsey / Chad Bloodworth vs Lance McCardle / Michael Marsiglia0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeo Selico / Jamie Brown vs Patrick Costello / Chuck Viator6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoe Vega / Daniel Oser vs Kenneth Rabalais / Will Newman0-6, 2-6
2026-05-28vs Bonnet-Generes/40/DII/TM/CPLost 03
L#1 DoublesJuan Melguizo / Phuong Nguyen vs Scott Martina / Thomas Wolf4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGuillermo Paredes / Ian Smith vs Jason Akers / Jason Bonnet3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesGokmen Guler / Jun Bausa vs Greg Harris / Ninh Tran2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0 NO (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bonnet-Generes/40/DII/TM/CP601715101
2Costello/40/DII/TM/MCC2461225173
3Selico/40/DII/TM/TTCC1541429177

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Chad Bloodworth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
John Lindsey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Jamie Brown
published 3.5
3.32
Phuong Nguyen
published
3.30
Leo Selico
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Juan Melguizo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Curry Royal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Guillermo Paredes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Gokmen Guler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Jun Bausa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Joe Vega
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Oser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Oser + Gokmen Guler044 matchesnot enough data
John Lindsey + Chad Bloodworth033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chad Bloodworth
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
John Lindsey
9W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Jamie Brown
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Phuong Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.32
Leo Selico
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.30
Juan Melguizo
35W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Curry Royal
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Guillermo Paredes
9W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Gokmen Guler
22W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
Jun Bausa
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
2.79
Joe Vega
12W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Daniel Oser
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.