Teams

Full Refund 2

Z-Refunded Players · Combo Leagues

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · Combo Leagues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOLDING000000
2Full Refund 1000000
3Full Refund 2000000
4No Fee Captain I000000
5Venable/Nashville000000
6Partial Refund 1000000
7Partial Refund 2000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jacqueline King
published 3.5
3.22
Mary Carkhuff
published
3.06
Cathy Radig
published 3.5
3.05
Lesly Todesco
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacqueline King
16W–12L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Mary Carkhuff
13W–16L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cathy Radig
6W–16L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Lesly Todesco
19W–34L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.