Teams

AR/Ward/Arkadelphia

2025 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-03vs AR/Canfield/Fort SmithWon 21
L#1 DoublesB J Hampton / Vicky Little vs C Aretha Lamar / Janice Carter7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCharlene Reinsch / Paulette Overton vs Sally Simon / Meg Canfield3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoyce Stroud / Joyce Martin vs Nancy Kremers / Myra Yates7-6, 6-3
2025-05-02vs AR/Stursma/NWALost 03
L#1 DoublesRita Stokes / Suzanne Marbury vs Kitti Severns / Vickie Adkins1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesB J Hampton / Vicky Little vs Jenny Grieser / Karen Kavanaugh4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKim Ward / Paulette Overton vs Leigh Wendlandt / Maggie Griesse4-6, 2-6
2025-05-02vs AR/Venable/MHLost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Marbury / Vicky Little vs Donna Hoffmann / Mary Bennett5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Ward / Charlene Reinsch vs Nancy Decker / Phyllis Venable2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoyce Martin / Joyce Stroud vs Carol Goldstein / Toni Fisher3-6, 0-6
2025-05-01vs TN/NoblesLost 12
W#1 DoublesB J Hampton / Vicky Little vs Kay Barcus / Sandy Haddad7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRita Stokes / Suzanne Marbury vs Sun Hui Wright / Plum Nobles0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKim Ward / Charlene Reinsch vs Deborah Kershner / Patricia Alfonso5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Charlene Reinsch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Joyce Stroud
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
B J Hampton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Paulette Overton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joyce Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Morrow
published
Rita Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Suzanne Marbury
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vicky Little
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

B J Hampton + Vicky Little5648% games−0.5% vs expected
B J Hampton + Paulette Overton4744% games−6.9% vs expected
Suzanne Marbury + Rita Stokes0535% gamesnot enough data
B J Hampton + Joyce Martin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charlene Reinsch
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Joyce Stroud
16W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
B J Hampton
9W–18L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paulette Overton
14W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Joyce Martin
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Morrow
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rita Stokes
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Marbury
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicky Little
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.