Teams

2-YDeaver-Eno-55+ S

2022 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-12vs 1-DBaker-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesYolanda Deaver vs Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBay Scott vs Kay Sharpe6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBay Scott vs Leslie Jackson2-6, 5-7
2022-06-21vs 1-DBaker-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesYolanda Deaver vs Mary T Long6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2022-06-14Won 20
W#1 SinglesBay Scott vs Jeanne Ryan7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesYolanda Deaver vs Debbie Baker6-4, 6-1
2022-05-31vs 1-DBaker-EnoWon 10
W#2 SinglesBay Scott vs Mary T Long6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Yolanda Deaver
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.64
Polly Hilsabeck
published
2.57
Kellie Johnson
published
2.42
Lilie Bonzani
published
2.41
Bay Scott
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Theresa Kreuzkamp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bay Scott + Yolanda Deaver213 matchesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Lilie Bonzani033 matchesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Kellie Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Yolanda Deaver
203W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%14%86%
3.14
Polly Hilsabeck
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Kellie Johnson
18W–24L career · no lines in 2022
0%30%70%
2.57
Lilie Bonzani
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Bay Scott
68W–136L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
Theresa Kreuzkamp
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.