Teams

SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS

2022 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 18 & OVER · 5.0 MEN- 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 4.83 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-04vs NV/HUBBARD/ADULT 18 & OVER M5.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRaymond Weich / Jordan Butler vs Frideric Prandecki / Ryan Gormley7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJack Busby vs Sean Hubbard0-1
2022-05-08vs NV/HUBBARD/ADULT 18 & OVER M5.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJack Busby / Cruz Colmenares vs Sean Hubbard / Jean-Laurent Pageault6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Barr vs Brendan Aguilar1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRaymond Weich / Brian Allen vs Max Novak / Frideric Prandecki1-6, 4-6
2022-04-29vs RED ROCK CC #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesRaymond Weich / Jack Busby vs Michael Copenhaver / Sean Amberg1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPhilipp Weise vs Levon Grigoryan2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Allen / Jordan Butler vs Brandon StClair / Sean Margulis5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-09vs NV/HUBBARD/ADULT 18 & OVER M5.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJack Busby / Adam Barr vs Frideric Prandecki / Matthew Mims4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRaymond Weich / Brian Allen vs Max Novak / Jean-Laurent Pageault3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-03-27vs RED ROCK CC #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRaymond Weich / Adam Barr vs Michael Copenhaver / Sean Amberg2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPhilipp Weise vs Levon Grigoryan4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 MEN- 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jack Busby
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
4.65
Raymond Weich
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.27
Adam Barr
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 5
4.25
Cruz Colmenares
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
Jordan Butler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Philipp Weise
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tyler Weekes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Barr + Philipp Weise8158% games−2.0% vs expected
Raymond Weich + Jack Busby314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jack Busby
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Raymond Weich
50W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
4.65
5
Adam Barr
73W–46L career · 11 lines in 2022
96%4%<1%
4.27
4.5
Cruz Colmenares
115W–54L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Jordan Butler
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Philipp Weise
20W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tyler Weekes
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.