Teams

Senioritas 9.0

Winter Adult 55 & Over Doubles · Ladies 9.0 55+

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ladies 9.0 55+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Laurie Byrne
published
4.09
Jane Flynn
published
4.09
Luann Lubojasky
published
3.99
Sally Banta
published
3.81
Lisa Ruggiero
published
3.76
Shelley Daddurno
published
Angie Shoemaker
published 4
3.66
Stacia Lundblad
published
3.31
Wendy Wilson
published
Lynne Wiggins
published
Sharon McKinney
published
Susan Dawson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacia Lundblad + Lisa Ruggiero8651% games+1.5% vs expected
Luann Lubojasky + Lisa Ruggiero4842% games−4.9% vs expected
Luann Lubojasky + Stacia Lundblad123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Byrne
40W–31L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.13
Jane Flynn
39W–34L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.09
Luann Lubojasky
22W–37L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
Sally Banta
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.99
Lisa Ruggiero
54W–54L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Shelley Daddurno
67W–30L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Angie Shoemaker
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacia Lundblad
49W–41L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Wendy Wilson
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
3.31
Lynne Wiggins
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sharon McKinney
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Dawson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.