Teams

McKey Park - Rickert

2025 Valdosta Southern Combo 40 & Over - Fall · Women 6.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-14vs Valdosta/Tina FolsomLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Kolisz / Leigh Ann Hogan vs Tina Folsom / Meghan Womack6-8
L#2 DoublesLeigh Jordan / Meredith Adams vs Dana Boruff / Tara Purvis4-8
L#3 DoublesAnne Rickert / Andrea Schruijer vs Becky Smith / Michelle Parkerson5-8
2025-09-13vs Valdosta/Tina FolsomLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Schruijer / Leigh Jordan vs Tina Folsom / Jennie Alvarez4-8
L#2 DoublesAnne Rickert / Leigh Ann Hogan vs Dana Boruff / Meghan Womack7-9
L#3 DoublesSarah Kolisz / Meredith Adams vs Julee Lincoln / Michelle Parkerson6-8
2025-09-06vs Valdosta/Tina FolsomLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeigh Jordan / Andrea Schruijer vs Tina Folsom / Jennie Alvarez3-8
L#2 DoublesAnne Rickert / Leigh Ann Hogan vs Julee Lincoln / Michelle Parkerson7-9
L#3 DoublesSarah Kolisz / Meredith Adams vs Becky Smith / Tara Purvis6-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McKey Park - Rickert0309974

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Sarah Kolisz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Anne Rickert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Leigh Ann Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Andrea Schruijer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Leigh Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Meredith Adams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Kolisz
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Anne Rickert
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leigh Ann Hogan
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Andrea Schruijer
2W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
Leigh Jordan
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Adams
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.