Teams

ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK CM8.5A

2022 COMBO · Men 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Jake Lam
published 4.5
4.26
Timothy Barlow
published
4.16
Steven Colletto
published
4.11
Phillip Lam
published
3.92
Shane Grevin
published
3.62
Luis Nanez
published
3.60
Jonathan Ivory
published
3.59
Gerald Mehciz
published 4
3.59
Geoffrey Kegley
published 4
3.57
Tony Fuller
published
3.56
Toby Tyler
published
3.51
Kevin Dahlstedt
published
Oscar Lam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shane Grevin + Tony Fuller224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jake Lam
22W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%44%
4.48
Timothy Barlow
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
Steven Colletto
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
Phillip Lam
11W–0L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Shane Grevin
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
Luis Nanez
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
Jonathan Ivory
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Gerald Mehciz
2W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.59
4
Geoffrey Kegley
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Tony Fuller
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Toby Tyler
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Kevin Dahlstedt
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Oscar Lam
29W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.