Teams

CMiles (Queens)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-03vs KBritt/AChristie (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRamonette Belen / Donna Stroupe vs Tracy Jenkins / Ashley Emison1-6, 0-6
2023-09-26vs LAndersen (Chestnut Square)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Patricia Fleming vs Stephanie Gossert / Lynsey Weber3-6, 2-6
2023-09-19vs MTurturro (OPRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Stroupe / Barbara Clement vs Mary Turturro / Eileen Jones2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-05vs SGrindle (Weddington)Split 11
L#2 DoublesChristine Miles / Donna Stroupe vs Stacey Herndon / Sandra Torres3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Renee Cauble vs Susan Staley / Bobbie McManus6-4, 6-4
2023-08-29vs JMiles (Life Time)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Patricia Fleming vs Elizabeth Myers / April Minish7-6, 6-3
2023-08-22vs MMetzl (Sardis)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Barbara Clement vs Linda Lober / Katherine Currier4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMaria Solorzano / Donna Stroupe vs Martha Metzl / Deborah Spaugh4-6, 1-6
2023-08-08vs TMagee/LDiman (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Jandebeur / Patricia Fleming vs Lindsey Smith / Laurie Diman2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Ramonette Belen
published
3.04
Brenda Jandebeur
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Maria Solorzano
published
2.85
Donna Stroupe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Barbara Clement
published 3
2.41
Sharon Smaston
published
Karen Morgan
published
Melina Adcock
published
Patricia Fleming
published
Renee Cauble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Clement + Donna Stroupe123 matchesnot enough data
Renee Cauble + Maria Solorzano033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ramonette Belen
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Brenda Jandebeur
166W–220L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.04
Maria Solorzano
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.88
3
Donna Stroupe
13W–45L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Barbara Clement
14W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Sharon Smaston
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.41
Karen Morgan
8W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melina Adcock
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Fleming
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee Cauble
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.