Teams

PFC-Willman

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-25vs WRAC-NoydLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Lamberson / Charles McElligott vs Richard Lester / Tracy Yount1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Vancott / Bill Popp vs Greg Brizendine / Mark Taylor4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Michael Bendtsen / Aaron Richmond6-4, 7-6
2025-10-25vs HRSC-The Daft GeezersWon 30
W#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Robert Spajic / Michael Oates6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesClark Richards / Sean Lumsden vs Charles Eastwood / Damon Clegg6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharles McElligott / Steve Lamberson vs Tim Arbogast / Doug Orr7-6, 6-4
2025-10-24vs YTC-Golden BallLost 12
L#1 DoublesRay Willman / John Omlin vs Ron Nehls / Mark Cherry6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Vancott / Bill Popp vs Danny Mullins / Karl Lieberknecht3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesClark Richards / Sean Lumsden vs John Fernandez / Craig Richardson6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
John Omlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Ray Willman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Sean Lumsden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Charles McElligott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Bill Popp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Steve Lamberson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Clark Richards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Robert Vancott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Vancott + Bill Popp4946% games+7.4% vs expected
John Omlin + Ray Willman423752% games+2.5% vs expected
Steve Lamberson + Charles McElligott111445% games−1.3% vs expected
Robert Vancott + Ray Willman21742% games−4.3% vs expected
Clark Richards + Bill Popp044 matchesnot enough data
Sean Lumsden + Bill Popp224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Vancott + Clark Richards033 matchesnot enough data
Clark Richards + Ray Willman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Omlin
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Ray Willman
37W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Sean Lumsden
19W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Charles McElligott
18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Bill Popp
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Steve Lamberson
21W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Clark Richards
21W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
Robert Vancott
36W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.