Teams

18Hoschette/Knoxville

2026 Mixed 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Mixed 18&over

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarty Hoschette / Debi English vs Brandon Stevens / Mari Low6-2, 6-4
2026-07-19vs Berning/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTyler Govert / Kimberly Nelson vs Brandon Parks / Lake Bailey3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJake Abernathy / Jill Hoschette vs Zachary Berning / Natalie Berning7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-12vs Ambrose/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesLOURDES BLANDINO / Jake Abernathy vs Brooke Govert / Jarod Regan4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHunter Arritt / Jill Hoschette vs Ankur Patel / Paola Martinez7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-06vs Open/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesHunter Arritt / Debi English vs Nathaniel Evans / Sarah Olesiuk6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJake Abernathy / Heather Wilson vs John Mason / Amy Belew6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMarty Hoschette / LOURDES BLANDINO vs Adam Mccall / Emily Miner6-0, 6-0
2026-06-28vs Berning/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHunter Arritt / Jill Hoschette vs RD McClenagan / Emily Mcclenagan7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTyler Govert / Kimberly Nelson vs Benjamin Burfeind / Imke Burfeind4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-23vs Ambrose/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesJake Abernathy / Debi English vs Michael Douglas / Georgia Rae Rainer6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLOURDES BLANDINO / Tyler Govert vs Paola Martinez / Daniel Moon2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarty Hoschette / Jill Hoschette vs Ankur Patel / Brooke Govert1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed 18&over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
118Hoschette/Knoxville4210818152
2Berning/Knoxville1441125162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jake Abernathy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.48
LOURDES BLANDINO
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
Debi English
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Jill Hoschette
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Hunter Arritt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Marty Hoschette
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Tyler Govert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Hoschette + Marty Hoschette6554% games−7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jake Abernathy
17W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
LOURDES BLANDINO
55W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Debi English
61W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.46
Jill Hoschette
28W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Hunter Arritt
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Marty Hoschette
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
Tyler Govert
39W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.