Teams

Starmount 18s 2.5W Tues PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 2.5 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-13vs Vaughn/Gonzalez 18s 2.5 Tues PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesSophia de Vries / Emily Nunn vs Clara Gonzalez Flores / Caroline Wilson2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSara Blake vs Meredith Lantz6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-06vs Opyd/Cohen 18s 2.5W Tues PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSara Blake vs Tia Opyd2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAutumn Culbreth / Brooke Wagner vs Nakisha Boulware Watts / Allison Sharpe6-3, 6-4
2025-04-29vs Corthum/West FOCC 18s 2.5W Tues PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesSophia de Vries / Lauren Marshall vs Lauren Roach / Megan Oliver1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauren McCombs / Brooke Wagner vs Brooke Williams / Bonnie Ferguson3-6, 1-6
2025-04-22vs Wyrick/Shumate 18s 2.5 Tues PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren McCombs / Emily Nunn vs Vanessa Haygood / Michelle Shumate6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAutumn Culbreth vs Rachel Summerlee6-7, 2-6
2025-04-08vs Milani 18s 2.5W Tues PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesLauren McCombs / Autumn Culbreth vs Lauren Davis / Caroline Jones1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Marshall / Sophia de Vries vs Erin Wallace / Colleen Pinyan3-6, 2-6
2025-04-01vs Vorys/Bender 18s 2.5W Tues PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesSophia de Vries / Lauren McCombs vs Shelly Penumalli / Hannah Miller2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAutumn Culbreth / Lauren Marshall vs Jill Bender / Annie Vorys0-6, 2-6
2025-03-25vs Vaughn/Gonzalez 18s 2.5 Tues PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesSophia de Vries / Nancy Miller vs Meredith Lantz / Rebecca McNeill0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAutumn Culbreth vs Julia Saguier1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.03 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Autumn Culbreth
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.05
Lauren McCombs
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.01
Sophia de Vries
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Emily Nunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Johan Gedlitschka
published
Lauren Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Blake
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren McCombs + Sophia de Vries033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Autumn Culbreth
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren McCombs
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Sophia de Vries
5W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Emily Nunn
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Johan Gedlitschka
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Marshall
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Blake
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.