Teams

Yates 6.5 Combo 18s Wed

2023 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-09-27vs Flanagan 6.5 Combo 18+WedLost 01
L#3 DoublesMeghan Flynn / Serena Igharas vs Gail Terrell / Mary Winstead5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-30vs Adams 6.5 Combo 18+ WedLost 01
L#3 DoublesSerena Igharas / Jessica Neal vs Kamron Moody / Megan Streba3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tiana Pitts
published
3.32
3.32
Serena Igharas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Allison Walsh
published 3.5
3.04
Jennifer Yates
published
2.97
Cassidy MacKay
published 3
2.95
Jessica Neal
published
2.87
Rebecca Morrison
published
2.77
Meghan Flynn
published
Jennifer Tewksbury
published
Julie Meadows
published
Kim Kyle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Yates + Allison Walsh1441% gamesnot enough data
Tiana Pitts + Allison Walsh314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.43
Tiana Pitts
38W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Christina Schulenklopper
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Serena Igharas
149W–124L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Allison Walsh
20W–27L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Jennifer Yates
8W–28L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Cassidy MacKay
26W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
2.97
Jessica Neal
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
Rebecca Morrison
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
Meghan Flynn
18W–37L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Jennifer Tewksbury
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Meadows
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kim Kyle
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.