Teams

GEPTA/18-39/6.5M/Cisneros/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 ADULT 18-39 LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-03-04Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSergio Franco vs Genaro Roldan4-6, 2-6
2026-02-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSergio Franco / Rene Ornelas vs Rodolfo Martinez / Sebastian Uribe3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2026 ADULT 18-39 LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18-39/6.5M/Trejo/EPTC#27118615192
2GEPTA/18-39/6.5M/Frank/EPCC44111327214
3GEPTA/18-39/6.5M/Cisneros/EPTC#11761837251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Carlos Franco
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.04
Adrian Aburto
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.44
Alfredo Barrios
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Efren Becerra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Findlay Gabriel Yepo
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 23% · published
Gabriel Delgado
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Hector Montalvo
usually #2 Doubles 28%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Mauricio Cisneros
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Raul Santillan
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Rene Ornelas
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Sergio Franco
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriel Delgado + Adrian Aburto9555% gamesnot enough data
Efren Becerra + Raul Santillan9357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carlos Franco
24W–10L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3
Adrian Aburto
21W–11L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Alfredo Barrios
0W–10L career · type A · 10 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
Efren Becerra
45W–21L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Findlay Gabriel Yepo
26W–39L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gabriel Delgado
18W–25L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hector Montalvo
29W–10L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mauricio Cisneros
72W–64L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raul Santillan
32W–17L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rene Ornelas
4W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sergio Franco
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.