Teams

MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC CM6.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 6.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Octavio Farfan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Frederick Raniel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Juan Arias
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Malvin Mercado
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.42
Art Biagtan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Tal Davidson
published
3.33
Kourosh Younesi
published
3.28
Anton Andreev
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Philip Madriaga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Johnny Zhou
published
3.21
Eljohn Alaban
published
2.95
Thomas Stuckey
published
2.87
Manoj Kandlikar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Ignacio Quiroz
published
2.82
Vishy Nirakari
published
2.79
Al Chiang
published 3
2.64
Gary Tellgren
published
2.61
Omid Sadraei
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Stuckey + Vishy Nirakari4255% games+0.2% vs expected
Octavio Farfan + Juan Arias0534% games−11.4% vs expected
Malvin Mercado + Tal Davidson224 matchesnot enough data
Al Chiang + Ignacio Quiroz134 matchesnot enough data
Gary Tellgren + Al Chiang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Octavio Farfan
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Frederick Raniel
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Juan Arias
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Malvin Mercado
21W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Art Biagtan
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Tal Davidson
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Kourosh Younesi
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Anton Andreev
33W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Philip Madriaga
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Johnny Zhou
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Eljohn Alaban
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Thomas Stuckey
22W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Manoj Kandlikar
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
Ignacio Quiroz
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Vishy Nirakari
22W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Al Chiang
10W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Gary Tellgren
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Omid Sadraei
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.