Teams

CCOC SUNG

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-18vs CSRC RAMSEYLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohane Aertker / Barbara Jean Knorr vs Jennifer Charlier Cox / Cindy Hoit2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-07-11vs MEMPK VIEIRAWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohane Aertker / Barbara Jean Knorr vs Teresa Vieira / Heidi Williams6-2, 6-4
2022-06-27vs GOG KREPSLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohane Aertker / Barbara Jean Knorr vs Sandy Negaard / Debra VanDeVeer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-20vs CSRC RAMSEYWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohane Aertker / Barbara Jean Knorr vs MARY SCOTT / Jennifer Gonzales6-4, 6-3
2022-06-13vs MEMPK VIEIRAWon 10
W#3 DoublesGinger Mentz / Barbara Jean Knorr vs Stacey Self / Mary Beth Yockey4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-06vs GOG KREPSLost 01
L#1 DoublesIrene Larimer / Barbara Jean Knorr vs Debra VanDeVeer / Roseann Engelage2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Barbara Jean Knorr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kelly Sung
published
3.10
Anne Janda
published 3.5
3.02
Johane Aertker
published
2.81
Irene Larimer
published 3
Cynthia Lund
published 3
2.45
Ginger Mentz
published 2.5
Laura Hemsworth
published
Leah Rogers
published
Mallory Sharp
published
R Abigail Yapor
published
Trudy Wells
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Jean Knorr + Anne Janda5261% games+5.7% vs expected
Cynthia Lund + R Abigail Yapor25957% games+0.7% vs expected
Trudy Wells + Irene Larimer11751% games−4.6% vs expected
Irene Larimer + Johane Aertker2444% games−10.7% vs expected
Cynthia Lund + Irene Larimer213 matchesnot enough data
Irene Larimer + Barbara Jean Knorr303 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Jean Knorr + Johane Aertker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Jean Knorr
68W–20L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Kelly Sung
44W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%10%90%
3.17
3.5
Anne Janda
29W–21L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Johane Aertker
25W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Irene Larimer
48W–36L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Cynthia Lund
34W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Ginger Mentz
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%66%34%
2.45
Laura Hemsworth
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leah Rogers
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mallory Sharp
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
R Abigail Yapor
30W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Trudy Wells
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.