Teams

MC GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-16vs LTC-M REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatthew Williams / Stefan Van Der Steen vs Jordan Zlotoff / Dmitry Vygodner6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSean Cochran vs Jacob Mueller7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDouglas Wong / David Sungelo vs Benoit Cauwe / Kurt Bulawa2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKishore Kulkarni / Rom van der Zee vs Seon Y Shin / David Klein3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-09vs NJ REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesMatthew Williams / Glen Todd vs Eric Huelson / Scott Overdyke1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Truchel vs Brian Parr1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesColin Wein / David Bailey vs Tristan Burm / Matthew Field2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRom van der Zee / David Sungelo vs Travis LaBerge / Ty Gee1-6, 4-6
2025-07-02vs MVCC BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesDavid Bailey / Douglas Wong vs Tucker Jeffrey / Daniel Merrell6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJohn Truchel vs Robert Charles5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGlen Todd / Colin Wein vs Ed Dodson / Chris McFarlin6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKishore Kulkarni / Rom van der Zee vs John Mullins / Nickolas Spinks7-6, 6-2
2025-06-25vs NJ BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatthew Williams / Stefan Van Der Steen vs Matt Farling / Kenton Wride6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Truchel vs Ron Funderburke6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRom van der Zee / Glen Todd vs Garrett Sailer / Richard Allen7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Bailey / Sean Cochran vs Claus Andersen / David Schaff2-6, 4-6
2025-06-18vs BP GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRom van der Zee / David Bailey vs Michael Richmond / Brian Dino3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSean Cochran vs Chris Evans1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Williams / Colin Wein vs Mitch Dickman / Damon Graham-Haradon6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKishore Kulkarni / Glen Todd vs Dave Klene / Frank Porada6-3, 6-1
2025-06-11vs RHCC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesRom van der Zee / Douglas Wong vs Ryan Wither / Michael Warren3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Truchel vs Matthew Charles6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Sungelo / Sean Cochran vs Daniel Rabbitt / Nick Hendrickson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIkiru Tochizawa / Kishore Kulkarni vs Richard Farquhar / James McKinney1-6, 2-6
2025-06-04vs MC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesMatthew Williams / Stefan Van Der Steen vs Michael Washer / Andrew Baker6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Truchel vs Adam Coleman6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Bailey / Douglas Wong vs Raymond Jacobsohn / Tim Lloyd6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Sungelo / Kishore Kulkarni vs Humberto Preciado / Brant Lahnert3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Glen Todd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.94
Stefan Van Der Steen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
John Truchel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.75
Matthew Williams
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Colin Wein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Sungelo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Ikiru Tochizawa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Rom van der Zee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Douglas Wong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Kishore Kulkarni
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Cochran
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glen Todd + Rom van der Zee6065% games+11.2% vs expected
Matthew Williams + Rom van der Zee7455% games+3.5% vs expected
Kishore Kulkarni + Rom van der Zee3249% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Williams + Glen Todd224 matchesnot enough data
Kishore Kulkarni + Sean Cochran123 matchesnot enough data
Kishore Kulkarni + Glen Todd213 matchesnot enough data
David Sungelo + Rom van der Zee123 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Williams + Stefan Van Der Steen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Glen Todd
20W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Stefan Van Der Steen
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.94
John Truchel
65W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Matthew Williams
64W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Colin Wein
13W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Sungelo
8W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Ikiru Tochizawa
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Rom van der Zee
70W–57L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Douglas Wong
9W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Kishore Kulkarni
21W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sean Cochran
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.