Teams

BC-WestEnd/CherylUnrein7.0

2026 Adult 55 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 7.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#3 DoublesNadine Trotter / Yoshiun Wong vs Donna Dunn / Diane Pryzbylo6-1, 6-0
2026-07-19vs BC LLW-MCC/TiffanyChen7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Landoch / Theresa Riley vs Jennifer Morrow / Teal Levine6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Hemmerich / Yoshiun Wong vs Siobhan Carroll / Susan Goldman3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMary Kay Dyes / KAORI MINAGI vs Frances Nelson / Nissa Diederich5-7, 0-6
2026-07-12vs BC-PVTC/ElizabethLujambio7.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesTheresa Riley / Angela Landoch vs Jenny Forsyth / Kristin Thomas2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJae Kim / Terry Paine vs Adrianne Kaufman / Carrie Munsell4-6, 2-6
2026-06-27vs BC-Peninsula/PattiYork7.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJae Kim / KAORI MINAGI vs Adeline Hui-Bon-Hoa / Veronica Deutsch3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHuong Mary Lai / Yoshiun Wong vs Maureen Takahashi / Ru Bai5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Sands / Nadine Trotter vs Linda Layton / Kay Cotter6-0, 6-1
2026-05-31vs BC LLW-MCC/TiffanyChen7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesKAORI MINAGI / Elizabeth Rogers vs Shannon Nicholson / Kristin Sibson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauran Jacks / Julie Mazor vs Amanda West / Luan Smith6-2, 6-3
2026-05-17vs BC-PVTC/ElizabethLujambio7.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Mazor / Renate Snow-Poe vs Elizabeth Lujambio / Akiko Cohen3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTheresa Riley / Angela Landoch vs Michelle Rosen / Janette Dawson5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-03vs BC-Peninsula/PattiYork7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesHuong Mary Lai / Brenda Patron Kodani vs Adeline Hui-Bon-Hoa / Prama Bhatt1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Landoch / Theresa Riley vs Lisa Drexinger / TINA ZIMMER7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJae Kim / KAORI MINAGI vs Evangeline Roxas-Butlig / Tess Hechmer7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · BC Women - 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC LLW-MCC/TiffanyChen7.05316823207
2BC-PVTC/ElizabethLujambio7.044131127218
3BC-WestEnd/CherylUnrein7.044101429208
4BC-Peninsula/PattiYork7.03591531237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Georgia Cano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Kim Graham
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Denise Sands
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Nadine Trotter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
KAORI MINAGI
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Elizabeth Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.42
Angela Landoch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Denise Matsumoto
published 3.5
3.33
Yuko Dundas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Lauran Jacks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Yoshiun Wong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Colleen Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Cheryl Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Brenda Patron Kodani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Julie Mazor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Huong Mary Lai
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Mary Kay Dyes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Barbara Hemmerich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Theresa Riley
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.57
Cheryl Unrein
published 3
Renate Snow-Poe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Paine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Rogers + Denise Sands7173% games+15.8% vs expected
Yuko Dundas + KAORI MINAGI11163% games+9.1% vs expected
Cheryl Williams + Barbara Hemmerich6748% games+2.6% vs expected
Angela Landoch + Theresa Riley4651% games−0.0% vs expected
Lauran Jacks + Julie Mazor11555% games−1.5% vs expected
Denise Matsumoto + Lauran Jacks3455% gamesnot enough data
Georgia Cano + Denise Matsumoto5076% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kay Dyes + KAORI MINAGI224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Georgia Cano
201W–33L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
4.16
Kim Graham
20W–9L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Denise Sands
27W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.65
Nadine Trotter
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
KAORI MINAGI
18W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Elizabeth Rogers
22W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Angela Landoch
3W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Denise Matsumoto
212W–93L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Yuko Dundas
96W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Lauran Jacks
36W–83L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Yoshiun Wong
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bernadette Straatsma
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Colleen Johnson
3W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cheryl Williams
85W–155L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Brenda Patron Kodani
54W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.13
Julie Mazor
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Huong Mary Lai
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Mary Kay Dyes
39W–114L career · 3 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Barbara Hemmerich
79W–90L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Theresa Riley
64W–66L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Cheryl Unrein
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Renate Snow-Poe
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Terry Paine
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.