Teams

SFV-LLW - Warner Warriors - Dan Meyers

SFV-SoCal Doubles-18 & Over · SFV - Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesOlga Marina / Christine Whigham vs Ivy Bautista / Lauren Soll7-5, 6-3
2021-12-05vs SFV-Slice of LifeWon 10
W#1 DoublesOlga Marina / Christine Whigham vs Ivy Bautista / Hanan Asfoury6-2, 6-3
2021-11-21vs SFV-RacketeersWon 10
W#1 DoublesOlga Marina / Christine Whigham vs Molly Jackson / Margie Englis6-3, 6-2
2021-11-13vs SFV-RacketeersWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Whigham / Olga Marina vs Pamela Bentley / Letty King6-1, 6-1
2021-11-06vs SFV-Chicks with SticksWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Whigham / Olga Marina vs MISSY LOPEZ / Jenny Ulch7-6, 6-4
2021-10-17vs SFV-Simply SmashingWon 10
W#1 DoublesOlga Marina / Christine Whigham vs Susan Mondt / Marion Basto6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Olga Marina
published
3.42
Jo Ann Thrailkill
published
3.23
Christine Whigham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Nataliya Padilla
published 3.5
2.89
Cindy Larson
published 3
2.57
Ada Ramirez
published 2.5
Lourdes Price
published
Sanaz Ossanloo
published
Souraya Smith
published
Veronica Garcia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Whigham + Nataliya Padilla3250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olga Marina
14W–13L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.21
Jo Ann Thrailkill
34W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Christine Whigham
132W–75L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Nataliya Padilla
60W–77L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Cindy Larson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
2.89
2.5
Ada Ramirez
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
0%29%71%
2.57
Lourdes Price
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sanaz Ossanloo
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Souraya Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Veronica Garcia
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.