← Teams

N OR-PTC-Kowalewski

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.55 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Monika Dolega-kowalewski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.41
Ian Fudalla
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.32
Kristin Fudalla
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
—
Brandt Wegner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.25
Michael Yee
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4.5
4.22
Bronwen Hager
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Rebecca Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Shannon Fraser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.83
June Wu
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.80
Minou Chau
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.79
Rudd McGarity
published 4.5
Results6 ties
2024-05-18Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBrandt Wegner / Shannon Fraser vs Kirsten Barnes / Joerg Droste6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJune Wu / Michael Yee vs Michelle Donato / Stefan Olander6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRudd McGarity / Rebecca Jacobs vs Deanna Lautenbach / Frank Collie6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-05-04Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRudd McGarity / Minou Chau vs Amanda Solomon / Steve Fogg7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrandt Wegner / Bronwen Hager vs Sue Gregoire / Steve Bidwell6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteve Eggerts / Monika Dolega-kowalewski vs Karen Sullivan / Matthew Trank6-2, 6-1
2024-04-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBronwen Hager / Brandt Wegner vs Steve Fogg / Kim Hill6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMinou Chau / Rudd McGarity vs Anne McCroskey / Matthew Trank6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJune Wu / Michael Yee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesIan Fudalla / Kristin Fudalla vs Anne McCroskey / Adrian Polliack6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrandt Wegner / Shannon Fraser vs Amanda Solomon / Jae Joon Kang6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMonika Dolega-kowalewski / Steve Eggerts vs Karen Sullivan / Patrick Trank7-6, 6-1
2024-04-06Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRebecca Jacobs / Michael Yee vs Kimberly Quach / Renato Bernasconi Zuccari6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteve Eggerts / Monika Dolega-kowalewski vs Kirsten Barnes / Craig Williams6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesIan Fudalla / Kristin Fudalla vs Yuko Hopman / Brian Leahy6-3, 6-1
2024-03-17Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJune Wu / Michael Yee vs Cathrine Olander / Joerg Droste7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristin Fudalla / Brandt Wegner vs Rebecca Redding / Renato Bernasconi Zuccari7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRebecca Jacobs / Rudd McGarity vs Deanna Lautenbach / Craig Williams6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Monika Dolega-kowalewski
129W–47L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Ian Fudalla
72W–13L career · type S
0%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Kristin Fudalla
64W–38L career
0%94%6%
4.32
4.5
Brandt Wegner
99W–70L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Michael Yee
87W–89L career · type M
0%97%2%
4.25
4.5
Bronwen Hager
44W–40L career
1%98%1%
4.22
4.5
Rebecca Jacobs
29W–34L career
7%92%1%
4.11
4.5
Shannon Fraser
154W–62L career
27%73%0%
3.95
4.5
June Wu
148W–91L career
58%42%0%
3.83
4.5
Minou Chau
115W–106L career
68%32%0%
3.80
4.5
Rudd McGarity
33W–65L career
73%27%0%
3.79

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.