Teams

Sunset All Day

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WE

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-27vs WAC WARRIORSSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKeressa Garland / Janice Pinnell vs Beth Bearer / Melissa Warren0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesClaudia Bay / Kate Centanni vs Kimberly Bickmore-Hutt / Na Shen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-12vs WAC NinjasSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Clark / SANDI WISE vs Kim Tavasoli / Lynn Abroms7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesClaudia Bay / Pam Schuberg vs Susie Castle / Robyn Russak4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-04-05vs Slice GirlsWon 20
W#1 SinglesSANDI WISE vs Akshatha Gangadhar6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGina Vazquez / Tanya Thompson vs Kate Torrence / Marilyn Germann6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesClaudia Bay / Keressa Garland vs Leanne Helfman / Sharon McBee1-6, 3-6
2025-02-09vs Ojai OrangesLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendy Brown / Keressa Garland vs Marie Brown / Katrina Rice Schmidt2-6, 3-6
2025-01-25vs Las Posas MimosasLost 01
L#3 DoublesMartha MacKer / Gina Vazquez vs Jean Salcido / Kelly Deardorff6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Laura Berger
published
3.41
Ina Kim
published
3.39
SANDI WISE
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Janice Pinnell
published
3.24
Kate Centanni
published
3.24
Isabella Richards
published
3.23
Dana Lawrence
published 3.5
3.22
Pam Schuberg
published
3.22
Wendy Brown
published
3.14
Gina Vazquez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Keressa Garland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Deborah Cassar
published 3.5
3.00
Tanya Thompson
published
2.96
Leah Cassar
published
2.96
Marie Smith
published
2.89
Claudia Bay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jean Bridges
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keressa Garland + Wendy Brown3257% games+7.6% vs expected
Marie Smith + Pam Schuberg4157% games+3.1% vs expected
Keressa Garland + Claudia Bay2446% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Bay + Gina Vazquez044 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Claudia Bay213 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Tanya Thompson033 matchesnot enough data
SANDI WISE + Gina Vazquez213 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Brown + Dana Lawrence033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Berger
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Janice Pinnell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kate Centanni
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Isabella Richards
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Dana Lawrence
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Pam Schuberg
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Wendy Brown
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Gina Vazquez
95W–140L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
3
Keressa Garland
88W–113L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.08
3.5
Deborah Cassar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Tanya Thompson
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Leah Cassar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Marie Smith
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Claudia Bay
67W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Jean Bridges
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.