Teams

Mendez/18/4.5/M/SHTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Adult 18 & Over - Men · 4.5 Shrev

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-01vs LA 4.5M 18 & Over (Floyd)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlie Leake / Richard Karam vs Marc Paz / Andrew Inabnet2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClement Du Payrat / Philip Pugh vs Stafford Lyons / Levi Holley0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesScott Nguyen / Robert Dean vs Jonathon Clark / Steven Floyd1-6, 3-6
2026-03-29vs Stanton/18/4.5/M/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesHayden Knight / Chad Doyal vs Thomas Rodsuwan / James Wilson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAntone Hill vs Alexander Jayroe3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesRichard Karam vs Harry Johnson3-6, 2-6
2026-03-27vs LA 4.5M 18 & Over (Floyd)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJustin Mendez vs Kody Anderson4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesClement Du Payrat vs Levi Holley1-6, 3-6
2026-03-22vs LA 4.5M 18 & Over (Floyd)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesClement Du Payrat / Philip Pugh vs Steven Floyd / Grady Wilson1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAntone Hill vs Kody Anderson0-6, 0-6
2026-03-08vs Stanton/18/4.5/M/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesHayden Knight / Richard Karam vs James Wilson / Suren Visvanathan6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCharlie Leake vs Matt Norton0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesClement Du Payrat vs Harry Johnson0-6, 1-6
2026-02-16vs Stanton/18/4.5/M/POTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRichard Karam / Robert Dean vs Jared Stanton / James Wilson5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJustin Mendez vs Jimmy Graves3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-15vs Stanton/18/4.5/M/POTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesJustin Mendez vs Matt Norton1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChad Doyal vs Suren Visvanathan1-6, 3-6
2026-01-18vs LA 4.5M 18 & Over (Floyd)Lost 05
L#1 DoublesCharlie Leake / Clement Du Payrat vs Marc Paz / Ridge Creech0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJustin Mendez vs Jonathon Clark2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Karam / Robert Dean vs Kody Anderson / Levi Holley3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesHayden Knight vs Will Street0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesScott Nguyen / Philip Pugh vs Stafford Lyons / Andrew Inabnet4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA 4.5M 18 & Over (Floyd)4120510140
2Stanton/18/4.5/M/POTC2391634247
3Mendez/18/4.5/M/SHTC021919120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Justin Mendez
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.86
Charlie Leake
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.75
Hayden Knight
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Antone Hill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Richard Karam
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.56
Robert Dean
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.56
Chad Doyal
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Clement Du Payrat
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.24
Philip Pugh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Doyal + Hayden Knight9357% games+7.0% vs expected
Chad Doyal + Richard Karam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Mendez
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Charlie Leake
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
3.86
4
Hayden Knight
21W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Antone Hill
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Karam
45W–25L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Robert Dean
4W–17L career · 11 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Chad Doyal
31W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Clement Du Payrat
0W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.40
Philip Pugh
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.