Teams

WParker (Queens)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-04vs CStaton (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAnna Hitchins / Xersalyn Threet vs Christine Kessel / Brantlee Green6-2, 6-1
2022-09-27vs THolwager (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesXersalyn Threet / Laine Parker Horvath vs Lina Clarke / Christine Wade3-6, 4-6
2022-09-20vs Drezek/SBrown (CITC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaine Parker Horvath / Anna Hitchins vs Suzy Brown / Sandy Mullis6-1, 6-4
2022-09-06vs SReynolds (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Anna Hitchins vs Lizzy Ervin / Caroline Pickup6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-23vs STo (OPRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLaine Parker Horvath / Anna Hitchins vs Ashley Rudolph / Michelle Ziewacz6-4, 6-1
2022-08-17vs JVarn (Palisades)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Katherine Hyde vs Jessica Varn / Cecilia Drake7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2022-08-09vs CWaldrop (Lifetime)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Kristen Oliver vs Tonya Terry / Joelle Surprenant6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Laura Alvarez
published
4.67
Brittney Desmond
published 5
4.45
Maggie Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Anna Hitchins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Laine Parker Horvath
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.11
Mary Beth Huffman
published
4.00
Xersalyn Threet
published
3.81
Kristen Oliver
published
Kaylyn Thompson
published
Wendy Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Oliver + Xersalyn Threet2442% games−8.0% vs expected
Anna Hitchins + Mary Beth Huffman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Alvarez
15W–13L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.71
5
Brittney Desmond
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.67
4.5
Maggie Lawrence
153W–102L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
Anna Hitchins
96W–51L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laine Parker Horvath
50W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
Mary Beth Huffman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
Xersalyn Threet
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
4.00
Kristen Oliver
52W–33L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Kaylyn Thompson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Parker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.