Teams

OC Seal Beach - Yoneko - S/S11

2026 OC 55 & Over Mixed Doubles · OC WE 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.46 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · OC WE 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC NBTC - Eddie000000
2OC Seal Beach - Yoneko - S/S11000000
3OC MetaServe - Debra - Sat9000000
4OC CMTC - Sonya - Sat11000000
5OC OC Tennis Lovers - LPC - Diekneit - Sat11000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Kangsung Yip
published 4
3.61
Hiro Saito
published 3.5
3.45
Forrest Morrow
published 3.5
3.41
Yoko Kurokawa
published
3.41
Mel Cabral
published 3.5
3.39
Tricia Bregman
published 3.5
3.36
Arison Hong
published 3.5
3.35
Eric Campos
published 3.5
3.34
Irene Fehr
published 3.5
3.29
Gail Scott
published 3.5
3.29
Kaeko Jenni
published 3.5
3.09
Rosette McClave
published
2.88
Amee Patel
published 3
2.84
CHERIE SHARP
published 3
Yoneko Buritica
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hiro Saito + Irene Fehr9171% games+11.9% vs expected
Eric Campos + Kaeko Jenni123 matchesnot enough data
Forrest Morrow + Yoko Kurokawa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kangsung Yip
132W–66L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
3.5
Hiro Saito
23W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.61
3.5
Forrest Morrow
26W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
Yoko Kurokawa
17W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Mel Cabral
141W–89L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Tricia Bregman
114W–117L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Arison Hong
14W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Eric Campos
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Irene Fehr
99W–98L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Gail Scott
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Kaeko Jenni
94W–89L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Rosette McClave
36W–37L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Amee Patel
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
CHERIE SHARP
12W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
2.84
Yoneko Buritica
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.