Teams

Doublegate (Kristine Reising)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.5 (*New* 3 Lines of Doubles - NO SINGLES)

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-25vs Hillbrooke (Jessica Wilson)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Sally / Eileen Wang vs Jessica Wilson / Rachel Simes2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNajma Khan / Aleksandra Waterstreet vs Karyn Baba / Jennifer Hayes1-6, 3-6
2024-07-12vs Wild Timber (Lindsay Hofmann)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Sally / Lauren Osborne vs Susan Kim / Jamie Bak1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKristine Reising / Amanda Short vs Eileen Cobb / Maribel Shields1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAleksandra Waterstreet / Nicole Yarid vs Mary Geil / Lindsay Hofmann1-6, 0-6
2024-06-25vs Wild Timber (Keri McCorvey)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBianca Giddens / Jennifer Sally vs Jill Lex / Taryn Sobh4-6, 7-5, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEileen Wang / Amanda Short vs Lori Mruk / Wilhelmine Casimir-Summers7-6, 3-6, 6-4
L#1 DoublesJennifer Sally / Eileen Wang vs Amy Chung / Kisung Kim4-6, 6-3, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristine Reising / Bianca Giddens vs Shinmi Kim / Genny Han6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPamela Heydinger / Aleksandra Waterstreet vs Shannon Shin / Sujung Chie1-6, 3-6
2024-06-11vs Grand Cascades (Amy Chestnut)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKristine Reising / Jennifer Sally vs Kortney Siegert / Soomy Sim1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNatalia Harvey / Eileen Wang vs Gail Griffin / Betsy Linder2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBianca Giddens / Kelsea Laun vs Ruth Brown / Rita Zagorski2-6, 1-6
2024-06-04vs St. Marlo (Ann Cha)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Wang / Lauren Osborne vs Angela Morgan / See Moua6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Short / Ashley Keim vs Sara Zywicki / Ann Cha1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Heydinger / Kelsea Laun vs Dong Suh / Soo Monahon1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · 3.5 (*New* 3 Lines of Doubles - NO SINGLES)
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eileen Wang
published 3.5
3.22
Jennifer Sally
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Kristine Reising
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Ashley Keim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Katie Shenoy
published
3.09
Najma Khan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Lauren Osborne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Nicole Yarid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Amanda Short
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bianca Giddens
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.47
Aleksandra Waterstreet
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Natalia Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Heydinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Osborne + Amanda Short3249% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Keim + Eileen Wang224 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Reising + Katie Shenoy224 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Reising + Lauren Osborne224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Sally + Eileen Wang213 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Reising + Bianca Giddens213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eileen Wang
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Sally
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Kristine Reising
25W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ashley Keim
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
Katie Shenoy
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Najma Khan
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Lauren Osborne
27W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Nicole Yarid
14W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.79
3
Amanda Short
32W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Bianca Giddens
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Aleksandra Waterstreet
6W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47
Natalia Harvey
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Heydinger
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.