Teams

Breakpoint/Sameer

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over · Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-06vs SuperSmash Bros/PottebaumLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhilip Kammann / Matthew Suddarth vs CHRISTOPHER KRIEGER / David Cabrera2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWesley Law / Steven Gibbons vs Joel Pottebaum / Sam Edwards4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSanjeev Kamat / Anthony Trent vs Jeremy Brown / Paul Malcharek0-6, 1-6
2025-09-29vs Hamliton/AbramsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesPaul Reiss / Philip Kammann vs Guillaume Huchet / Jason Ariston6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Suddarth / Wesley Law vs McKenzie Rawden / Kyle Feder1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Frederick / Sanjeev Kamat vs Christopher Stark / Stuart Friess3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesPhilip Kammann / Paul Reiss vs Paul Gontarz / Stefan Nosic3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Gibbons / Matthew Suddarth vs Genyl Rufino / Brendan Czaicki3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBo Jin / Anthony Trent vs Harold Nottingham / Matt Essman2-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs SuperSmash Bros/PottebaumLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Reiss / Philip Kammann vs CHRISTOPHER KRIEGER / David Cabrera2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWesley Law / Raymond Yang vs Joel Pottebaum / Stephen Barker6-7, 3-5
L#3 DoublesSanjeev Kamat / Bo Jin vs Dave Heritage / Miles Yetter1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-08vs Hamliton/AbramsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesZachary Plocher / Philip Kammann vs Eric Abramson / Guillaume Huchet0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Suddarth / Raymond Yang vs Charles Welton / Travis Bakai3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnthony Trent / Matthew Frederick vs Kevin Deaton / William Gregerson6-4, 7-5
W#1 DoublesRafay Cheema / Paul Reiss vs Stefan Nosic / Joseph Hunter0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Gibbons / Matthew Suddarth vs Brendan Czaicki / Peter Gontarz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-18vs SuperSmash Bros/PottebaumLost 12
W#1 DoublesRafay Cheema / Raymond Yang vs Nathan Meinert / David Cabrera6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Gibbons / Matthew Frederick vs Sam Edwards / Joel Pottebaum1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSanjeev Kamat / Bo Jin vs Miles Yetter / Paul Malcharek4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-11vs Hamliton/AbramsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRafay Cheema / Zachary Plocher vs Guillaume Huchet / Jason Ariston4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWesley Law / Raymond Yang vs Charles Welton / Kyle Feder5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAzher Sameer / Anthony Trent vs Christopher Stark / William Gregerson1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesRafay Cheema / Zachary Plocher vs Stefan Nosic / Paul Gontarz6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWesley Law / Steven Gibbons vs Alex Boker / Peter Gontarz6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBo Jin / Matthew Frederick vs Matt Essman / Smeet Merchant3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Gontarz/Cheese 5: The Cheese Strikes Back8119819209
2SuperSmash Bros/Pottebaum54141328241
3Hamliton/Abramson45151229230
4Breakpoint/Sameer1862147310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Zachary Plocher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Philip Kammann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Wesley Law
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Matthew Suddarth
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Steven Gibbons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Anthony Trent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Bo Jin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Sanjeev Kamat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Azher Sameer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Matthew Frederick
published
Paul Reiss
published
Rafay Cheema
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bo Jin + Sanjeev Kamat1543% games+4.0% vs expected
Paul Reiss + Philip Kammann2841% gamesnot enough data
Steven Gibbons + Wesley Law213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Plocher
41W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
Philip Kammann
81W–116L career · 5 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
Wesley Law
121W–84L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
Matthew Suddarth
87W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Steven Gibbons
37W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Anthony Trent
25W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Bo Jin
36W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
Sanjeev Kamat
66W–111L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.13
3
Azher Sameer
38W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Matthew Frederick
2W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Reiss
36W–59L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rafay Cheema
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.