Teams

GSTL40/Fedele/GrandeDunes

40 & Over Tri-Level · 40 & Over 4.5-3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-20vs LCTA40/Strickland/MaybankLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Francis / James Himsworth vs Jeff Percy / William Barrett4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Fedele / Terry Walden vs Matt MacKelcan / Chris Wigginton1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKenneth Santiago / James Full vs Matt Fultz / Scott Usher2-6, 1-6
2025-09-20vs SC 4.5-3.5 Men 40 & Over (Reese)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Francis / James Himsworth vs Glenn Reese / Charles Webb1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Fedele / Terry Walden vs Adalberto Taguchi / Marc Verde0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKenneth Santiago / James Full vs Chris Stier / Palmer Williams1-6, 0-6
2025-09-19vs LCTA40/Strickland/MaybankLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Francis / James Himsworth vs Daniel Strickland / Doug MacKelcan0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Fedele / Terry Walden vs Matt MacKelcan / Chris Wigginton6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Full / Kenneth Santiago vs Scott Usher / Matt Fultz0-6, 0-6
2025-09-19vs SC 4.5-3.5 Men 40 & Over (Reese)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Francis / James Himsworth vs Andrew Jacob / Glenn Reese0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Fedele / Terry Walden vs Marc Verde / David Weise1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKenneth Santiago / James Full vs Chris Stier / Tim Kvam1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 4.5-3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
James Himsworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Craig Berkey
published 4
3.37
Kenneth Santiago
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Terry Walden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Daniel Fedele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Nick Malasi
published
2.84
James Full
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Max Alon
published
Shawn Godwin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Walden + Daniel Fedele0523% games−10.9% vs expected
Kenneth Santiago + James Full044 matchesnot enough data
Terry Walden + Kenneth Santiago213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Himsworth
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Craig Berkey
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
Kenneth Santiago
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Terry Walden
28W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Daniel Fedele
15W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Nick Malasi
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3
James Full
1W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
Max Alon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Godwin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.