Teams

RCC BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-24vs MEA TEALWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Troudt / Heather Huelsman vs Kimberly Weintraub / Kylie Crandall5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-20vs NJ GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesNaomi Gaeng / Madison Walz vs Katie Keighley / Kristen Lovely3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Troudt / Tracy Zahner vs Svitlana Pylypenko / INNA SELIVERSTOVA2-6, 0-6
2023-05-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Troudt / Tracy Zahner vs Laura Freeman / Kristina Klug0-6, 2-6
2023-05-03vs TTA-E BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesNaomi Gaeng / Madison Walz vs Jessica Marten / Laura Harris6-3, 6-3
2023-05-01vs CVTA REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlana MacY / Madison Walz vs Hope Yasbin Engel / Joni Roberts6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaura Troudt / Tracy Zahner vs Natalie Richardson / Julie Clement6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Sara Wang
published
2.75
Madison Walz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Laura Troudt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Rilla Baca
published
2.60
Alana MacY
published 3
2.34
Mandy Sutton
published
2.22
Heather Huelsman
published
1.82
Tracy Zahner
published
Naomi Gaeng
published
Piper Connelly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Sutton + Laura Troudt404 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Zahner + Laura Troudt213 matchesnot enough data
Sara Wang + Laura Troudt213 matchesnot enough data
Sara Wang + Alana MacY303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Wang
24W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Madison Walz
34W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Laura Troudt
31W–29L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
Rilla Baca
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Alana MacY
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Mandy Sutton
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.34
Heather Huelsman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.22
Tracy Zahner
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Naomi Gaeng
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Piper Connelly
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.