Teams

Henry’s Hooligans 40+3.5

2026 Baltimore Adult 40 & Over · Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-04vs Foehrkolb 40+3.5Won 31
W#1 DoublesAlex Cheng / Anirudh Sridharan vs Anthony LaVigne / Chris Miller6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTom Cavers vs Jon Roll5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoshua Fisher / Mark Lachowicz vs John Pettit / David Kraus6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteven Gibau / David Sherman vs Rongfeng Li / Edmond Pittman6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-30vs Foehrkolb 40+3.5Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAlex Cheng / Tyce Henry vs Jeet Sandhu / Anthony LaVigne2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesPerceval Singh vs Andy Sasaki6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Sherman / Mark Lachowicz vs Jason Chamberlain / George Sybert6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSteven Gibau / Andrew Smith vs Joe Deleon / David Kraus2-6, 0-6
2026-07-24vs Foehrkolb 40+3.5Split 22
L#1 DoublesJesper Gronvall / Anirudh Sridharan vs Anthony LaVigne / Andy Sasaki4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesPerceval Singh vs Jon Roll3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Cheng / Tyce Henry vs Jason Chamberlain / Rongfeng Li6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMark Lachowicz / Ryan Clifton vs George Roberts / George Sybert6-1, 6-0
2026-06-23vs Foehrkolb 40+3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesJon Kucskar / Andrew Smith vs Chris Miller / Anthony LaVigne2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Cheng / Tyce Henry vs Jeet Sandhu / Kevin Foehrkolb6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMark Lachowicz / Tom Cavers vs Jon Roll / Jagannath Surampudi7-5, 6-1
2026-06-20vs Foehrkolb 40+3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesJoshua Fisher / Jon Kucskar vs Joe Deleon / Kevin Foehrkolb7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTom Cavers / Perceval Singh vs George Roberts / David Kraus4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlex Cheng / Tyce Henry vs John Pettit / Rongfeng Li3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-16vs Foehrkolb 40+3.5Lost 13
L#1 DoublesJoshua Fisher / Jesper Gronvall vs Anthony LaVigne / Andy Sasaki3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Clifton vs Chris Miller2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlex Cheng / Steven Gibau vs Kevin Foehrkolb / George Sybert6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Smith / Mark Lachowicz vs David Kraus / Jon Roll1-6, 4-6
2026-06-07vs Foehrkolb 40+3.5Split 22
W#1 DoublesJesper Gronvall / Ryan Clifton vs Joe Deleon / Jagannath Surampudi5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMike Bailey vs Chris Miller2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnirudh Sridharan / Steven Gibau vs John Pettit / Edmond Pittman6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Edwards / Tom Cavers vs Kevin Foehrkolb / Jeet Sandhu0-6, 0-6
2026-06-05vs Foehrkolb 40+3.5Won 31
L#1 DoublesRyan Clifton / Tom Cavers vs Jeet Sandhu / Anthony LaVigne2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPerceval Singh vs Kevin Foehrkolb6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnirudh Sridharan / Jesper Gronvall vs Joe Deleon / David Kraus6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTyce Henry / Mark Lachowicz vs Rongfeng Li / George Roberts7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Baltimore Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Foehrkolb 40+3.553161635279
2Henry’s Hooligans 40+3.535161635281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Jesper Gronvall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.51
Tom Cavers
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.50
Anirudh Sridharan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Mark Lachowicz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Ryan Clifton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.20
Joshua Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Tyce Henry
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.16
Perceval Singh
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Paul Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Steven Gibau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Mike Bailey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jon Kucskar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Fisher + Jesper Gronvall224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jesper Gronvall
9W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
Tom Cavers
5W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Anirudh Sridharan
15W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Mark Lachowicz
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Ryan Clifton
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Joshua Fisher
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Tyce Henry
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
Perceval Singh
6W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16
Paul Edwards
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Steven Gibau
167W–242L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Mike Bailey
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Jon Kucskar
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.