Teams

SBartle.40C-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve

12 players · average NTRP 2.85 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 16 6:30 PM
UNC Faculty Staff Recreation Association
Sep 23 6:30 PM
Whippoorwill Park
2026-09-02vs CMurray-HRLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Goll / Susanne Schmal vs Preeya Gupta / Lissa Gotwals1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Kruse / Carin von Kahr vs Ellie Turner / Jennifer Dunlap4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLilie Bonzani / Shannon Bartle vs Tina Prinstein / Lindsey McIver3-6, 4-6
2026-08-26vs MKuehn-DFCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Goll / Cheryl Smyth vs Beth Anderson / Sarah Parker1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarin von Kahr / Cecilia Gonzales vs Emily McClernon / Jeanne Murray4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBay Scott / Susanne Schmal vs Colleen Cowperthwait / Lindsey Wu0-6, 0-6
2026-08-19vs MGriffiths-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCecilia Gonzales / Kim Goll vs Kelly Mathews / Erin Flanagan0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Schaller / Susanne Schmal vs Celina Morice / Barbara Correal5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Kruse / Shannon Bartle vs Yvonne Acker / Destiny Lopez2-6, 1-6
2026-08-12vs JDeConto.40.6.5C-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Smyth / Cecilia Gonzales vs Amanda Alexander Klein / Tracey Maurer6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Schaller / Susanne Schmal vs Julie DeConto / Rebecca Walsh0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBay Scott / Susan Parent vs Thuy Brooks / Becki Cleveland1-6, 3-6
2026-08-05vs TStefan-HSLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Goll / Carin von Kahr vs Mary Macdonald / Millicent Snow0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBay Scott / Liz Schaller vs Altagracia Evert / Donna Spero1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Bartle / Susan Parent vs Tynita Edwards / Laura Webb-Murrah3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MGriffiths-CHTC3090135
2KMcWhorter-DUR3081234
3RDavis-CHTC2060030
4LCaldwell.40.6.5C-SVC2163656
5MKuehn-DFC2163880
6SStowe.40.6.5C-SVC2154855
7SGraff.40.6.5C-Dur2163978
8JDeConto.40.6.5C-DUR2154972
9TStefan-HS1133652
10MFulton-UNC12361391
11CMurray-HR12271486
12GLofrese.40.6.5-TOCH02151066
13LGilchrist-CHCC03271499
14KRyan-HVCC031817105
15SBartle.40C-DUR030918112

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Cheryl Smyth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Kim Goll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Carin von Kahr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.71
Liz Schaller
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Cecilia Gonzales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Matalaba Napier
published
2.54
Susanne Schmal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.43
Shannon Bartle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Lilie Bonzani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Bay Scott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.29
Susan Parent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Christine Kruse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Schaller + Shannon Bartle21241% games+0.7% vs expected
Shannon Bartle + Christine Kruse1530% games−3.5% vs expected
Bay Scott + Liz Schaller1636% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Smyth + Kim Goll4350% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Gonzales + Carin von Kahr1535% gamesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Christine Kruse1439% gamesnot enough data
Shannon Bartle + Carin von Kahr044 matchesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Lilie Bonzani033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cheryl Smyth
212W–231L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Kim Goll
132W–134L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Carin von Kahr
43W–63L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Liz Schaller
76W–108L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Cecilia Gonzales
49W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Matalaba Napier
13W–25L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
Susanne Schmal
61W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
3
Shannon Bartle
40W–155L career · 4 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.43
Lilie Bonzani
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Bay Scott
68W–136L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Susan Parent
16W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Christine Kruse
17W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.