Teams

Jussely/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-24vs Moore/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Hudson / Suraj Sarvode Mothi vs Cade Bishop / Caden LeBlanc6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPeyton Neal / Mike Galdieri vs Griffin Lonardo / Stephen Lindsey4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRamon Cuesta vs Benjamin Austin6-1, 6-3
2025-11-23vs McKenna/MemphisWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichael Hudson / Ramon Cuesta vs Jay Thakkar / Robert Bradsher7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGabe LaBonia vs Benjamin Lacy6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrandon Brackett / David Johnson vs Zach Pretzer / Michael Parks6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSuraj Sarvode Mothi / Eric Slaughter vs Ludovic Bruneau / Brent Church6-4, 6-2
2025-11-13vs Downs/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Hudson / Gabe LaBonia vs Jason Downs / Frank Robilio6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRamon Cuesta / Mike Galdieri vs Greg Hollingsworth / Paul Ohrberg6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Stukenborg / Suraj Sarvode Mothi vs Bill Clark / Jeff Summers6-0, 6-2
2025-11-04vs Thomas/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Hudson / Suraj Sarvode Mothi vs Josh Thomas / Wade Hodge6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPeyton Neal / Brandon Brackett vs Hunter Ivy / Eric Efron6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Denegri / Ramon Cuesta vs Maheedhar Maddi / Vidyasagar Velamala7-5, 6-2
2025-10-25vs Burbank/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesJonathan Jussely / John Stukenborg vs Berkeley Burbank / Clayton Eber5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Hudson / Suraj Sarvode Mothi vs Keith Yarrow / Michael Holder6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPeyton Neal / John Mikl vs Charles Coolidge / Shawn Sentilles6-1, 6-1
2025-10-22vs Coopwood/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Hudson / Gabe LaBonia vs Alan Willis / Ryan Coopwood6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJonathan Jussely / Peyton Neal vs Stephon Stanton / Samuel Corcoran6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrandon Brackett / John Mikl vs Alan Kirk / Matt Stark6-4, 6-2
2025-10-18vs Buchanan/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Hudson / Suraj Sarvode Mothi vs William Lancaster / Dusty Nelson6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesSteve Denegri / David Johnson vs Taylor Lackie / Griffin Beard2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRamon Cuesta / Mike Galdieri vs Ben Avant / Jason Buchanan6-1, 6-3
2025-10-01vs Howard/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Hudson / Gabe LaBonia vs Ezekeil Hudson / Calvin Price6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrandon Brackett / Peyton Neal vs Karl Guenther / Kruger Peoples6-2, 6-3
2025-09-30vs Yen/MemphisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichael Hudson / Santhosh Dinakaran vs Irwin Corpuz / Matthew Logiudice2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRamon Cuesta vs Cade Benedict6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeyton Neal / Brandon Brackett vs Drew Mascolino / Steven Philips6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJonathan Jussely / David Johnson vs Jonathan Yen / Dongwoo Kim4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Peyton Neal
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.60
Brandon Brackett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.56
Ramon Cuesta
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.48
Jonathan Jussely
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Suraj Sarvode Mothi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Gabe LaBonia
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.22
Mike Galdieri
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
3.07
John Stukenborg
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
3.04
Santhosh Dinakaran
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
John Mikl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Steve Denegri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peyton Neal + Brandon Brackett5072% games+18.3% vs expected
John Mikl + Peyton Neal303 matchesnot enough data
John Mikl + Brandon Brackett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peyton Neal
27W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79
3.5
Brandon Brackett
43W–4L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
Ramon Cuesta
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Jonathan Jussely
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Suraj Sarvode Mothi
14W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Gabe LaBonia
20W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Mike Galdieri
27W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.22
John Stukenborg
24W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Santhosh Dinakaran
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
John Mikl
15W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Steve Denegri
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.