Teams

Club Fit JV 40 plus

2025 40&Over Men · 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-22vs WTC: 4.0 40+ CantuLost 04
L#1 DoublesHasan Dajani / Blake Johnson vs Jason Brown / Roy Cantu1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBruce Newman vs Ross Prussin0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Gutowski / Andre Newfield vs Stephen Master / Brett Moskowitz1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMark Roberts / Jeremy Wall vs Uzair Dossani / Christopher Sparrow1-6, 2-6
2025-07-16vs CRRC 40 ParliaLost 04
L#1 DoublesLane Bonadies / Blake Johnson vs Ernie Biele / Gregory Morley4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKen Berry vs Adam Lubart3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFrancesco Zappoli / Matthew Fairweather vs Dariusz Jarzabkowski / Lawrence Sternkopf7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Roberts / Frank Borell vs James Hanchrow / Florin Parlia6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-07-08vs CRRC: Court JestersLost 04
L#1 DoublesLane Bonadies / Frank Borell vs Kurt Tondorf / David Becker3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesFrancesco Zappoli vs Craig Sofer0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Newman / Daniel Herbst vs Justin Gallagher / Jesse Brundige1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Gutowski / Matthew Fairweather vs Josh Faust / Jason Moskowitz3-6, 0-6
2025-07-07vs WTC: 4.0 40+ CantuLost 03
L#1 DoublesDipak Chandy / Matthew Fairweather vs Robert Brennan / Richard Nugent1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Borell / Francesco Zappoli vs Jason Brown / Brian Snyder0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHasan Dajani / Blake Johnson vs William Foster / David Wenstrup4-6, 6-7
2025-06-25vs WTC: 4.0 40+ Hit N RunLost 04
L#1 DoublesFrank Borell / Lane Bonadies vs Robert Chun / Jeff Kramer3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKen Berry vs Hector Rodriguez6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndre Newfield / Robert Gutowski vs Derek Rahman / David Antenucci6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesFrancesco Zappoli / Marc Giacomi vs Marc Cohen / William Sample6-7, 4-6
2025-06-17vs Match Point TerrorsLost 13
L#1 DoublesFrank Borell / Lane Bonadies vs Perry Fishkind / Jose Pinal4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesFrancesco Zappoli vs William Deakins4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBlake Johnson / Ken Berry vs George Sheffey / Peter Ortiz7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeremy Wall / Mark Roberts vs Kevin Irani / Richard Liu2-6, 1-6
2025-06-03vs CRRC: Court JestersLost 04
L#1 DoublesMarc Giacomi / Hasan Dajani vs Kurt Tondorf / David Becker6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKen Berry vs Jesse Brundige6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFrank Borell / Francesco Zappoli vs Justin Gallagher / Mario Valadez Trevino1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGlen Rae / Dipak Chandy vs Arjun Ganesan / Jason Moskowitz0-6, 1-6
2025-05-27vs CRRC 40 ParliaLost 13
L#1 DoublesJeremy Wall / Blake Johnson vs Keith Seidman / James Hanchrow3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesFrancesco Zappoli vs Adam Lubart1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Borell / Lane Bonadies vs Ernie Biele / Adam Zagoria5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDipak Chandy / Matthew Fairweather vs Lawrence Sternkopf / Steven Foster2-6
2025-05-20vs WTC: 4.0 40+ Hit N RunSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChristopher Crawford / Lane Bonadies vs David Lee / Tiphaine Masse6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDipak Chandy vs Aaron Segal3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Gutowski / Daniel Herbst vs David K. Lee / William Sample3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesFrancesco Zappoli / Frank Borell vs Will Cheng / Derek Rahman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-06vs Match Point TerrorsWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristopher Crawford / Frank Borell vs Jose Pinal / Jim Serrano6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesFrancesco Zappoli vs William Deakins6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRobert Gutowski / Daniel Herbst vs Dave Baggenstoss / George Sheffey7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBlake Johnson / Matthew Fairweather vs Peter Chavez / Peter Ortiz6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SUNY Purchase - Net Magic0825517222
2County Tennis Cryptoballers 4.00892347313
3WTC: 4.0 40+ The Ace Kickers09152041309
4Match Point Mavericks09152145330
5Southern: Lifetime01035415244
6WTC: 4.0 40+ Cantu01033717221
7CRRC: Court Jesters01035519254
8WTC: 4.0 40+ Hit N Run010192046376
9CRRC 40 Parlia010172250378
10Club Fit JV 40 plus01083267442
11Premier Athletic Club01073368424
12Match Point Terrors01073371448

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Blake Johnson
published 4
Christopher Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Daniel Herbst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Lane Bonadies
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.63
Frank Borell
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Francesco Zappoli
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Hasan Dajani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Ken Berry
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Bruce Newman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Marc Giacomi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.41
Robert Gutowski
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.36
Dipak Chandy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Matthew Fairweather
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Jeremy Wall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Glen Rae
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Borell + Francesco Zappoli61048% games−1.2% vs expected
Lane Bonadies + Frank Borell2645% games−2.8% vs expected
Hasan Dajani + Matthew Fairweather0524% games−12.4% vs expected
Frank Borell + Matthew Fairweather224 matchesnot enough data
Robert Gutowski + Matthew Fairweather033 matchesnot enough data
Glen Rae + Matthew Fairweather123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Blake Johnson
6W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher Crawford
45W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Daniel Herbst
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Lane Bonadies
61W–47L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Frank Borell
46W–56L career · 9 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Francesco Zappoli
22W–58L career · 9 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Hasan Dajani
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Ken Berry
13W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Bruce Newman
0W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Marc Giacomi
6W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.41
Robert Gutowski
14W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.41
Dipak Chandy
13W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Matthew Fairweather
15W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
Jeremy Wall
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
Glen Rae
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Roberts
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.