Teams

Hemani-Motter/Knoxville

2024 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-01vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesHailey Motter / Lisha Venable vs Ali Dunnavant Edwards / Karen Collins4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJanet Jungclaus vs Cassidy Hunsucker2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShireen Hemani / Caroline McGinnis vs Jen Rose / Nikki Tilson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKimberly Wunderlich vs Ginger Arthur1-3
L#3 DoublesDawn Duke / Sherry van Beke vs Maggie Reynolds / Anessa Savici0-6, 4-6
2024-04-20vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesCaroline McGinnis / Leigh Gatto vs Angie Goodwyn / Katherine Goodner0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesHailey Motter vs Courtney Dyer6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJanet Jungclaus / Sherry van Beke vs Bailey Nguyen / Jen Rose3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Duke / Sue Mather vs Anita Downes / Olga Sokolov1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-13vs Dunn/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesJanet Jungclaus / Sherry van Beke vs Cassidy Hawkins / Lauren Cox2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHailey Motter vs Lindsay Singewald6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCaroline McGinnis / Sue Mather vs Parker Casler / Katie Warden7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesShireen Hemani vs Ruthie Ivy6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMelissa Kirby / Leigh Gatto vs Chelsea Grindstaff / Hannah Frame1-6, 1-6
2024-04-07vs Dunn/KnoxvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesShireen Hemani / Hailey Motter vs Marilyn Cameron / Rhonda Mann6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJanet Jungclaus vs Ruthie Ivy6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCaroline McGinnis / Sherry van Beke vs Chelsea Grindstaff / Cassidy Hawkins4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLeigh Gatto vs Lindsay Singewald2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLisha Venable / Kimberly Wunderlich vs Angela Rae Rhody / Sarah Attkisson5-7, 4-6
2024-03-30vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesCaroline McGinnis / Chandra Thompson vs Sandy Garrard / Olga Sokolov0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeigh Gatto vs Cassidy Hunsucker1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShireen Hemani / Sue Mather vs Jen Rose / Angie Goodwyn0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesHailey Motter vs Tugba Turnaoglu6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GomesStallingsBarton/Knoxville62271329267
2McElrathMonarch/Knoxville44192145355
3Maute/Knoxville44192146344
4Ferguson-Bodie/Knoxville35182248361
5Henderson/Knoxville35172350385
6Hemani-Motter/Knoxville0561938253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Hailey Motter
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.58
Sue Mather
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Shireen Hemani
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.34
Dawn Duke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Caroline McGinnis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.28
Lisha Venable
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.98
Sherry van Beke
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
1.79
Leigh Gatto
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Chandra Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Jungclaus
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kimberly Wunderlich
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisha Venable + Hailey Motter134 matchesnot enough data
Shireen Hemani + Hailey Motter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hailey Motter
13W–14L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Sue Mather
4W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
Shireen Hemani
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Dawn Duke
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Caroline McGinnis
3W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.28
Lisha Venable
7W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
2.28
Sherry van Beke
4W–18L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Leigh Gatto
3W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.79
Chandra Thompson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Janet Jungclaus
6W–18L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberly Wunderlich
3W–4L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.