Teams

LA - Full Metal Racquets

2022 Weekday Winter Women's Doubles - Local League Only - LA · LA - Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-08vs LA - LATC Drop ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesSharona Malekan / Donna Sanders vs Catharine Soros / Shauna Cross6-2, 6-3
2022-04-01vs LA - LATC Drop ShotsWon 20
W#2 DoublesDonna Sanders / Rae Bochco vs MARY WOODWARD / Thalia Gelbard6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Prange / Susan Moreno vs Shauna Cross / Betsy Malloy6-0, 6-1
2022-03-25vs LA - LATC Drop ShotsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRae Bochco / Ana Calleja vs Christina McEnerney / Shauna Cross6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDonna Sanders / Susan Moreno vs Thalia Gelbard / Nora Suk6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2022-03-18vs LA - LATC Drop ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharona Malekan / Rebecca Prange vs Beverly Gatica / MARY WOODWARD6-2, 6-2
2022-02-25vs LA - LATC Drop ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharona Malekan / AB Young vs Michele Werdin / Thalia Gelbard6-3, 6-3
2022-02-11vs LA - LATC Drop ShotsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKathleen Dohrmann / Rae Bochco vs Patricia Lombard / Beverly Gatica6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Moreno / Donna Sanders vs Shauna Cross / Christina McEnerney6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
AB Young
published 4
3.40
Nicole Martino
published
3.38
Sharona Malekan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Rae Bochco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Alexis Cittadine
published 3.5
3.15
Jennifer Demoff
published
3.13
Linda Tyrer
published
3.08
Kathleen Dohrmann
published
3.08
Rebecca Prange
published
2.76
Susan Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Smith Terry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Demoff + Linda Tyrer5352% games+4.5% vs expected
Nicole Martino + Rae Bochco033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AB Young
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Nicole Martino
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Sharona Malekan
55W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Rae Bochco
32W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Alexis Cittadine
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Jennifer Demoff
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Linda Tyrer
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
Kathleen Dohrmann
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Rebecca Prange
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Susan Moreno
26W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.76
Laura Smith Terry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.