← Teams

SHC-Gray/Hill

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5+ Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.42 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Kim Hill
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
—
Lisa Gray
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.23
Carol Woolman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.02
Karen Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.99
Heidi Affentranger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.67
Anne McCroskey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Results7 ties
2019-06-30Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Anne McCroskey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-06-22Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesKaren Mathews / Carol Woolman vs Yumiko Pike / Becky Rey6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKim Hill / Lorrie Vogel vs Rebecca Redding / Stacy Webster6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2019-06-16Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesKim Hill vs Kristin Fudalla4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Mathews / Carol Woolman vs Jill Sather / Carrie Engle6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2019-06-15Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesKim Hill / Carol Woolman vs Julie Hanson / Eileen Reid6-3, 6-4
2019-06-01Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesCarol Woolman / Bonnie Sidoff vs Lisa Lynch / Lisa Lyon6-2, 6-2
2019-05-17Split 1–1
L#1 SinglesKim Hill vs Nicole Mather6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Woolman / Lisa Gray vs Mari Mitchelson / Trina Denson6-3, 6-4
2019-05-05Lost 1–2
L#1 SinglesHeidi Affentranger vs Sarah Townley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Anne McCroskey vs Mary Rousseau / Marie Picard6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Hill / Bonnie Sidoff vs Kelly Branson / Nancy Osborne6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kim Hill
94W–59L career
0%98%2%
4.26
4.5
Lisa Gray
90W–56L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Carol Woolman
31W–13L career · type S
1%96%3%
4.23
4.5
Karen Sullivan
62W–81L career
12%88%0%
4.02
4.5
Heidi Affentranger
78W–81L career
18%82%0%
3.99
4
Anne McCroskey
34W–52L career
6%94%0%
3.67

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.