Teams

Slice Girls

Fall Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY (Non-Adv) · Womens 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.72 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-05vs NetchixLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Lavengco / Colleen Peters vs Jennifer Hempel / Marian Adrian4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-10-29vs Simply SmashingLost 02
L#1 SinglesTeresa Scott vs Karis Webb0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAshley Pribble / Christine Richardson vs Kerri Wise / Helen Bourgeois1-6, 0-6
2025-10-22vs Bayside BallersLost 14
L#1 DoublesTara Coco / Marion Karvas vs Lisa Hackett / Stephanie Short5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTeresa Scott vs Brenda Threadgill0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Peters / Andrea Hudler vs Debbie Myogeto / Courtney Oldham2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLiz Kweller vs Valerie Gnagi6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesHanlu Li / Lane Proctor vs Susannah Whelan / Andrea Ursha6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-15vs Tough LoveLost 12
L#1 SinglesTeresa Scott vs Kyle Robertson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Richardson / Grainne Gilliam vs Brittany Hamel / Patricia Day6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesColleen Peters / Lane Proctor vs Ann Jerome / Victoria Smith2-6, 1-6
2025-10-08vs Westwood Volley LlamasWon 20
W#1 DoublesGrainne Gilliam / Teresa Scott vs Meagan Labunski / Margaret Lang3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Richardson / Hanlu Li vs Dane Robson / Dalton Young3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-01vs The Volley Partons 4.0Lost 23
L#1 DoublesTara Coco / Amanda Perez vs Jill Coody Smits / Amy Mulvihill6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristine Matus vs Amy Gogolin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Richardson / Ashley Pribble vs Murphy Moon / Esther Torres7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesLiz Kweller vs Brittani Sonnenberg6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesHanlu Li / Andrea Hudler vs Bernadette Muegel / Amanda Fults1-6, 1-6
2025-09-24vs Naughty by NETureWon 10
W#2 DoublesTeresa Scott / Grainne Gilliam vs Lori Burden / Janice Trentacosti6-3, 6-3
2025-09-17vs Austin AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Scott / Grainne Gilliam vs Michelle Butterfield / Karie Pettinati6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLane Proctor / Christine Richardson vs Diane Singleton / Mary Anne Clement3-6, 2-6
2025-09-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Richardson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Shannon Eckerle
published
Cheryl Lavengco
published 4
Christine Matus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.67
Amanda Perez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Grainne Gilliam
published 4
3.56
Tara Coco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Teresa Scott
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Liz Kweller
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.43
Colleen Peters
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Kathy Noble
published
Ashley Pribble
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Christine Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 11% · published 3.5
3.23
Marion Karvas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Hanlu Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Andrea Hudler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Lane Proctor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Kweller + Andrea Hudler6161% games+5.3% vs expected
Amanda Perez + Tara Coco4546% games−4.3% vs expected
Teresa Scott + Grainne Gilliam5647% games−5.7% vs expected
Christine Richardson + Liz Kweller303 matchesnot enough data
Lane Proctor + Marion Karvas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Eckerle
32W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Cheryl Lavengco
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Christine Matus
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Amanda Perez
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Grainne Gilliam
62W–51L career · no lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
Tara Coco
20W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Teresa Scott
17W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
Liz Kweller
45W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Colleen Peters
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Kathy Noble
12W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Ashley Pribble
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Christine Richardson
29W–32L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Marion Karvas
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Hanlu Li
33W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Andrea Hudler
38W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Lane Proctor
10W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.