Teams

HCC - A. Alhadeff

2021 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-02-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Hockin / Mark Wolfson vs Rick Tyrrell / Jim Kennerly3-6, 6-7
2021-02-21vs Hills - Nomads/R. SternsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlbert Alhadeff / Darin Garner vs Randy Sterns / Rick Tyrrell6-3, 7-5
2021-02-15vs Hills - Nomads/R. SternsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Wolfson / Roger Bensinger vs Randy Sterns / Donald Bell6-3, 6-3
2021-02-07vs Hills - Nomads/R. SternsLost 01
L#3 DoublesThor Moody / Darin Garner vs Randy Sterns / John Leep5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-01-31vs Hills - Nomads/R. SternsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Hockin / Thor Moody vs John Leep / Terry Reeb6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-01-17vs Hills - Nomads/R. SternsWon 20
W#1 DoublesThor Moody / Roger Bensinger vs Randy Sterns / Stephen Mullis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Wolfson / Martin Revello vs John Leep / Terry Reeb6-4, 7-6
2021-01-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesRoger Bensinger / Thor Moody vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
3.74
John Hockin
published
3.72
Thor Moody
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Martin Revello
published
3.52
Darin Garner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Mark Wolfson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Kosloske
published
William Christensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Wolfson + Darin Garner213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Wolfson + Thor Moody123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
John Hockin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
Thor Moody
148W–97L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
Martin Revello
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Darin Garner
104W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
Mark Wolfson
62W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Kosloske
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
William Christensen
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.