Teams

Em.Perry18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-22vs He.Remley18A5.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / MacY Fisher vs Heather Remley / Mia Bobrowski6-2, 6-1
2024-04-15vs He.Remley18A5.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesJeni Burnette / Karen Rothschild vs Jamie Breunig / Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-4, 6-4
2024-04-14vs He.Remley18A5.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Anne Frautschi vs Mia Bobrowski / Ivette Duran7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Perry / Jeni Burnette vs Jennifer Hiller / Paula Collado Cordon6-2, 7-6
2024-03-10vs He.Remley18A5.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Neal Goodwin vs Paula Collado Cordon / Rosa Tapia5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Perry / Jeni Burnette vs Elizabeth Hodges / Heather Remley7-6, 6-2
2024-03-03vs He.Remley18A5.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Moler Glass / Julia Albritton vs Jennifer Hiller / Jamie Breunig6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.99
Jeni Burnette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.80
Alice Stubbs
published 5
4.79
Anne Frautschi
published 5
4.68
Kelly Moler Glass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.66
Sarah Barnhill
published
4.63
Bonnie Stabler
published 5
4.62
Emily Perry
published 5
4.43
Neal Goodwin
published
4.39
Kathie Stronach
published 4.5
4.35
MacY Fisher
published
4.30
Jode Ritsema
published
Karen Rothschild
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeni Burnette + Emily Perry7266% games+2.3% vs expected
Emily Perry + Alice Stubbs314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jeni Burnette
52W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
4.99
5
Alice Stubbs
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.80
5
Anne Frautschi
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
4.79
5
Kelly Moler Glass
70W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.68
Sarah Barnhill
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
4.66
5
Bonnie Stabler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
4.63
5
Emily Perry
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.62
Neal Goodwin
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
4.43
4.5
Kathie Stronach
78W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
MacY Fisher
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
4.35
Jode Ritsema
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.30
Karen Rothschild
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.