Teams

Pendergraft/Nashville

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 5.5 Women - FRI AM & MON PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-15vs Walker/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Nealy / Ashley Kirkland vs Meg Stemmler / Margaret Bourland1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Eggebrecht / Sarah Ann Pendergraft vs Amelia Brown / Emma Caylor1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Hamrick / Margaret Emley vs Heidi Kemp / Reagan Buie2-6, 2-6
2025-09-08vs Herrera/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Ann Pendergraft / Rita Spellings vs Abigail Hale / Alix Cross6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Claiborne / Jenny Hamrick vs Grace van Winkle / Tiffany Chen0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Derck / Michelle Nealy vs Leah Riek / Haley Fairman2-6, 3-6
2025-08-25vs Monte/Spittle/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Kirkland / Jenny Hamrick vs Mary Elizabeth Armor / Olga Jacobsen4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRita Spellings / Katie Claiborne vs Olga Spittle / Danielle Anfuso2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Emley / Morgan Estep vs Keira Yu / Lesa Monte2-6, 0-6
2025-08-18vs Walker/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesCasey OGrady / Rita Spellings vs Leslie Klurfeld / Amelia Brown3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Derck / Michelle Nealy vs Rachel Walker / Emily Richardson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Eggebrecht / Margaret Emley vs Erin Schorkopf / Cristin Webb2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-08-11vs Herrera/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Nealy / Ashley Kirkland vs Alicia Herrera / Anna Miller4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Emley / Jenny Hamrick vs Carey Hoover / Leah Riek2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Ann Pendergraft / Katie Claiborne vs Katy Miller / Tiffany Chen2-6, 0-6
2025-08-04vs Monte/Spittle/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Ann Pendergraft / Elizabeth Derck vs Marcy Mickiewicz / Ryoko Yamanobe2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Claiborne / Ashley Kirkland vs Erica Stepanishen / Jess Lee0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Nealy / Rita Spellings vs Olga Jacobsen / Jessie Seaman0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women - FRI AM & MON PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Elizabeth Derck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Margaret Emley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.44
Rita Spellings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.41
Ashley Kirkland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.28
Sarah Ann Pendergraft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Emily Eggebrecht
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.20
Casey OGrady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Morgan Estep
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Michelle Nealy
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
1.96
Katie Claiborne
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
1.82
Jenny Hamrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rita Spellings + Michelle Nealy8170% games+27.2% vs expected
Jenny Hamrick + Morgan Estep056% games−14.7% vs expected
Katie Claiborne + Michelle Nealy044 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Hamrick + Katie Claiborne033 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Emley + Rita Spellings123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Derck
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Margaret Emley
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Rita Spellings
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
3
Ashley Kirkland
2W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.41
Sarah Ann Pendergraft
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Emily Eggebrecht
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.27
Casey OGrady
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.20
Morgan Estep
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.19
Michelle Nealy
12W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Katie Claiborne
0W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Jenny Hamrick
0W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.