Teams

Sports Mall-Stroud-Peterson/Maxfield

2021 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 2.5W

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-12-11Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesNaomi Stroud-Peterson / Emily Matheson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-12-04Won 20
W#2 Female DoublesNaomi Stroud-Peterson / Emily Matheson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 Female DoublesShawna Smart / Michelle Lynn Maxfield vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-20vs Salt Lake Tennis--DelongSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesMichelle Lynn Maxfield / Jillian Decker vs Nicole Huston / Kassie Torres2-6, 4-6
W#3 Female DoublesNaomi Stroud-Peterson / Emily Matheson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-13vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Callister/EnceLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesNaomi Stroud-Peterson / Emily Matheson vs Melanie Knaphus / Erika Doty3-6, 1-3, 0-1
2021-11-06Won 20
W#1 Female DoublesNaomi Stroud-Peterson / Shawna Smart vs Holly Ricker / Jessica Somerville6-3, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesMichelle Lynn Maxfield / Jillian Decker vs Kelly Lund / Lindy Parks6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Lexi Farr
published 3.5
3.48
Bethany Bodily
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Julie Black
published
3.25
Michelle Lynn Maxfield
usually #2 Female Doubles 33%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Tori Locke
published
2.79
Naomi Stroud-Peterson
usually #1 Female Doubles 40%, also #2 Female Doubles 40% · published 3
Emily Matheson
published 3
2.61
Shawna Smart
published
1.91
Olivia Moreton
published
Jillian Decker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bethany Bodily + Julie Black12072% games+16.5% vs expected
Shawna Smart + Tori Locke6162% games+11.4% vs expected
Shawna Smart + Naomi Stroud-Peterson10652% games+10.1% vs expected
Lexi Farr + Tori Locke332652% games+4.9% vs expected
Lexi Farr + Julie Black6160% games+2.6% vs expected
Naomi Stroud-Peterson + Emily Matheson101842% games−1.0% vs expected
Michelle Lynn Maxfield + Naomi Stroud-Peterson1433% games−8.3% vs expected
Tori Locke + Naomi Stroud-Peterson0735% games−10.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lexi Farr
160W–77L career · no lines in 2021
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Bethany Bodily
120W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%55%44%
3.48
Julie Black
68W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Michelle Lynn Maxfield
84W–58L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.25
Tori Locke
109W–90L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.00
3
Naomi Stroud-Peterson
139W–157L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Emily Matheson
55W–67L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shawna Smart
108W–123L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
2.61
Olivia Moreton
85W–121L career · no lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Jillian Decker
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.