Teams

Broward/Vargas

2026 Broward Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men-Fri

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-24vs Piccolo/MiltonWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Kamrad / Santiago Moreno Escallon vs Milton Diaz / Alberto Pineres6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMauricio Holguin / Alejandro Sananez vs Edward Benavides / Francisco Sifontes4-6, 1-1
W#3 DoublesJose Salazar / Jack Vargas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-21vs Piccolo/MiltonWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaulo Gomes / Nelson Rincon vs Alberto Pineres / Jorge Jimenez6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJack Vargas / Santiago Moreno Escallon vs Milton Diaz / William Pacanins7-5, 6-2
2026-03-07vs Piccolo/MiltonWon 21
W#1 DoublesLuis Garcia / Paulo Gomes vs Edward Benavides / Rafael Echeverria6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJose Salazar / Louis Jordan vs Silverio Exposito / Alberto Pineres6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMauricio Holguin / Alejandro Sananez vs Milton Diaz / William Pacanins2-3
2026-02-20vs Piccolo/MiltonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLouis Jordan / Paulo Gomes vs Pradip Chhadva / Edward Benavides6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJose Salazar / Luis Garcia vs Rafael Echeverria / Jorge Jimenez6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdolfo Salazar / MARCOS URRA vs Alberto Pineres / Milton Diaz6-0, 6-0
2026-02-06vs Piccolo/MiltonWon 21
W#1 DoublesJose Salazar / Michael Kamrad vs Francisco Sifontes / Edward Benavides6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesWilliam Diez / Jack Vargas vs Rafael Echeverria / Alberto Pineres3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlejandro Sananez / Mauricio Holguin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-01-30vs Piccolo/MiltonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJose Salazar / MARCOS URRA vs Silverio Exposito / Francisco Sifontes3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNelson Rincon / Adolfo Salazar vs Edward Benavides / Mario Correa1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWilliam Diez / Luis Garcia vs Alberto Pineres / Rafael Echeverria3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men-Fri
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Broward/Vargas5114410112
2Piccolo/Milton1541430195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Santiago Moreno Escallon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
William Diez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
MARCOS URRA
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Jack Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Alejandro Sananez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Adolfo Salazar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jose Salazar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Louis Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mauricio Holguin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Kamrad
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Nelson Rincon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Paulo Gomes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paulo Gomes + Louis Jordan5267% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Santiago Moreno Escallon
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
William Diez
12W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
MARCOS URRA
11W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Jack Vargas
54W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Alejandro Sananez
47W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Adolfo Salazar
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jose Salazar
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Louis Jordan
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mauricio Holguin
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Kamrad
12W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nelson Rincon
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paulo Gomes
6W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.