Teams

Swan/18/3.0/NON/CP

2025 NO Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.0 NO (18&O) Women Night

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-04-29vs Lewis/18/3.0/NON/XUSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMeg Couvillon / Holly Garrity vs Allison Duhe / Cindy Oufnac7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJill May / Kelly Scairono vs Francesca Brighty / Belinda Janeski3-6, 4-6
2025-04-22vs Teesdale/Fallahi/18/3.0/NON/CPLost 04
L#1 DoublesKelly Scairono / Stephanie Boh vs Anne Hughs / Gretchen Douglas1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanie Irvin / Roquel Savoy vs Natalie Mikhailov / Catherine Sewell4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMonica Gros vs Dana Broussard Labat6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMattie Garner / Paige Jeha vs Barb Neff / Anne Worden6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-15vs Singer/Holder/18/3.0/NON/CPLost 05
L#1 DoublesMeg Couvillon / Elinor Sanders vs Alicia Holder / Melissa Maia1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJane Dufour vs Helen Graves0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanie Irvin / Holly Garrity vs Kristen Singer / Josie Azuma1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Scairono vs Natalie Treadway0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJill May / Lisa Wurtzel vs Mairin Cutrer / Lauren England1-6, 2-6
2025-04-09vs Keller/Kiefer/18/3.0/NON/CapsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChalon Case / Monica Gros vs Deidre Blackwell / Gwen Keller3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEvelyn Poitevent vs Cameron Angelo3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJane Dufour / Elinor Sanders vs Neyda Leslie / Eileen Grass1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill May / Lisa Wurtzel vs Cynthia Bradford / Donna Morgan5-7, 4-6
2025-04-01vs Potts/18/3.0/NON/CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesChalon Case / Monica Gros vs Libby Bourgeois / Laura Potts6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRoquel Savoy / Holly Garrity vs Brianna Rauch / Brandelyn Rauch1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMattie Garner / Janie Irvin vs Katherine Davis / Kristi Joseph6-4, 6-4
2025-03-18vs Landrieu/18/3.0/NON/CPLost 13
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Poitevent / Jane Dufour vs Kristie Powers / Beth Juge6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Swan / Meg Couvillon vs Lyndi Ainsworth / Ashley Boisfontaine6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKelly Scairono vs Celeste Mikes3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMattie Garner / Janie Irvin vs Jeanne Boe / Janine LeBlanc Walsdorf4-6
2025-03-11vs Forster/18/3.0/CPLost 05
L#1 DoublesElinor Sanders / Evelyn Poitevent vs Lacey Charvet / Heidi Dugan0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJane Dufour vs Victoria Sacco0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Swan / Meg Couvillon vs Kallen Forster / Callie Butcher2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPaige Jeha vs Leslie McMichael0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Scairono / Roquel Savoy vs Burke McFerrin / Catherine Fabre2-6, 1-6
2025-02-24vs Marcus/18/3.0/NON/PRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesChalon Case / Holly Garrity vs Natalie Pottharst / Darlene Landry0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKelly Scairono / Roquel Savoy vs Kelly Gajewski / Ariane MacAlester7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMattie Garner / Janie Irvin vs Michelle Perdomo / Kathleen Allen7-6, 7-5
2025-02-05vs Williamson/18/3.0/NON/NOCCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHolly Garrity / Monica Gros vs Robin Williamson / Sarah Webb6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesElinor Sanders vs Kristen Cahoon6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMattie Garner / Paige Jeha vs Melyne Holmes / Lucy Browne0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJill May / Lisa Wurtzel vs Louise Smallpage / Emily Foster3-6, 3-6
2025-01-28vs Generes/Woessner/18/3.0/NON/CPLost 05
L#1 DoublesHelen Swan / Chalon Case vs Macey Osorno / Kristen Kain4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesElinor Sanders vs Claiborne Moses2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Boh / Evelyn Poitevent vs LeAnne Woessner / Tara Thomas6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJane Dufour vs Christine Bonnet2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Callaway / Lisa Wurtzel vs Laura Fisse / Danielle Maggio1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Forster/18/3.0/CP91391126283
2Teesdale/Fallahi/18/3.0/NON/CP91361438375
3Generes/Woessner/18/3.0/NON/CP73311944394
4Landrieu/18/3.0/NON/CP73262453438
5Singer/Holder/18/3.0/NON/CP64331736374
6Potts/18/3.0/NON/CP55242659448
7Williamson/18/3.0/NON/NOCC37203064476
8Swan/18/3.0/NON/CP37153574526
9Keller/Kiefer/18/3.0/NON/Caps28203070489
10Marcus/18/3.0/NON/PRC28173374506
11Lewis/18/3.0/NON/XU28143674491

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Helen Swan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Kelly Scairono
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.65
Chalon Case
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Evelyn Poitevent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Jane Dufour
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.51
Elinor Sanders
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.49
Monica Gros
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.47
Janie Irvin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.47
Meg Couvillon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.45
Roquel Savoy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.42
Holly Garrity
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.35
Lisa Wurtzel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Jill May
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mattie Garner
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Paige Jeha
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Stephanie Boh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill May + Lisa Wurtzel3844% games+4.4% vs expected
Evelyn Poitevent + Elinor Sanders2349% games−0.6% vs expected
Meg Couvillon + Holly Garrity1638% games−4.0% vs expected
Kelly Scairono + Roquel Savoy3445% games−7.5% vs expected
Chalon Case + Monica Gros2443% games−9.3% vs expected
Roquel Savoy + Holly Garrity1439% gamesnot enough data
Janie Irvin + Holly Garrity134 matchesnot enough data
Jane Dufour + Evelyn Poitevent033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Helen Swan
0W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Scairono
21W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Chalon Case
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Evelyn Poitevent
6W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Jane Dufour
5W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Elinor Sanders
7W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Monica Gros
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Janie Irvin
7W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Meg Couvillon
3W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.47
Roquel Savoy
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45
3
Holly Garrity
7W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
Lisa Wurtzel
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Jill May
4W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.18
Mattie Garner
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paige Jeha
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Boh
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.