← Teams

PT&E/SJRC-Lee

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.14 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Paige Polizois
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Divneet Kaur
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.01
Emilee Plank
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.80
Zach Bergthold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Nijimaru Ohno
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
—
Aleina Tanabe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
—
Daniel Paul
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.75
Sally Murdoch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Julian Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Zachary Ferguson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Megan Soucy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Results8 ties
2024-11-16Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesKyahn Daraee / Aleina Tanabe vs Holly Kanz / Nate Larsen6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAidan Lee / Divneet Kaur vs Sarah Carrato / Keith Main7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-10Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesEmilee Plank / Louis Wheatley vs Stefan Youngs / Catherine Cai6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSally Murdoch / Julian Miller vs HOLLY LIBERATORE / Bryan Judy6-2, 6-0
2024-11-03Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesDaniel Paul / Hannah Plank vs Luke Filose / Vivian Nguyen7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPaige Polizois / Nijimaru Ohno vs Jason Qian / Mary Bullard6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBrandie Hill / Zach Bergthold vs Wenyan Li / Mary Green-Zwemke6-2, 6-1
2024-10-19Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesNijimaru Ohno / Megan Soucy vs Scott Holland / Angie Lee6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAidan Lee / Divneet Kaur vs Rie Sasakawa / NANDA SIDDAIAH6-3, 7-6
2024-10-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHannah Plank / Daniel Paul vs Daniel Albrecht / Deanna Lautenbach7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAleina Tanabe / Julian Miller vs Eric Lee / Jen Lewis7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLouis Wheatley / Sally Murdoch vs Rich Rice / Elisa Geller6-4, 6-3
2024-10-06Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Paul / Hannah Plank vs Seth Yount / Shannon Roarke6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrianna Hill / Zachary Ferguson vs Tod Johnston / Heather Dudley6-4, 7-5
2024-09-28Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesPaige Polizois / Nijimaru Ohno vs Jason Qian / Kasey Williams6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJulian Miller / Megan Soucy vs Luke Filose / Vivian Nguyen6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAidan Lee / Divneet Kaur vs Surya Vadivazhagu / Mary Green-Zwemke6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJulian Miller / Paige Polizois vs Emily McBride / Tom Lonergan6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSally Murdoch / Zach Bergthold vs Christine Wall / Bill Rhoades3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Paige Polizois
61W–38L career
0%95%5%
4.33
4.5
Divneet Kaur
12W–21L career
4%94%2%
4.16
4.5
Emilee Plank
74W–48L career
12%88%0%
4.01
4
Zach Bergthold
40W–47L career
0%98%1%
3.80
4
Nijimaru Ohno
59W–42L career
0%99%0%
3.75
4
Aleina Tanabe
20W–19L career
not enough data
—
4
Daniel Paul
28W–16L career
not enough data
—
4
Sally Murdoch
42W–35L career · type M
5%93%2%
3.75
4
Julian Miller
42W–28L career
5%93%2%
3.75
4
Zachary Ferguson
9W–16L career
13%84%3%
3.69
4
Megan Soucy
22W–39L career
4%96%0%
3.68

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.